Key result
Endothelial function (NO synthesis-dependent flow) and forearm muscularity independently explained 52% of the variation in insulin-stimulated blood flow (multiple R=0.72, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Are physical fitness, limb muscularity, and endothelial function independent determinants of insulin-stimulated blood flow in normal subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=22)
Are physical fitness, limb muscularity, and endothelial function independent determinants of insulin-stimulated blood flow in normal subjects?
Endothelial function (NO synthesis-dependent basal blood flow) and forearm muscularity are independent determinants of insulin-stimulated blood flow in normal subjects.
Endothelial function and muscularity may shape insulin-stimulated blood flow; leaves open causality and fitness contribution in normal subjects.
Insulin induces vasodilation via stimulation of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. This action of insulin exhibits considerable interindividual variation. We determined whether the response of blood flow to endothelium-dependent vasoactive agents correlates with that to insulin or whether other factors, such as physical fitness, limb muscularity, or vasodilatory capacity, better explain variations in insulin-stimulated blood flow. Direct measurements of the forearm blood flow response to three 2-h sequential doses of insulin (1, 2, and 5 mU/ kg.min), endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine) and endothelium-independent (sodium nitroprusside) vasoactive agents, and ischemia (reactive hyperemic forearm blood flow) were performed in 22 normal subjects (age, 24 +/- 1 yr; body mass index, 22.2 +/- 0.6 kg/m2; maximal aerobic power, 40 +/- 2 mL/kg.min). The highest insulin dose increased blood flow by 111 +/- 17%. The fraction of basal blood flow inhibited by NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (NO synthesis-dependent flow) varied from 6-47%. Maximal aerobic power (r = 0.52; P < 0.02), the percentage of forearm muscle (r = 0.50; P < 0.02), and the NO synthesis-dependent flow (r = 0.42; P < 0.05), but not reactive hyperemic, acetylcholine-stimulated, or sodium nitroprusside-stimulated flow, were significantly correlated with insulin-stimulated (5 mU/kg.min) blood flow. In multiple linear regression analysis, 52% of the variation (multiple R = 0.72; P < 0.001) in insulin-stimulated blood flow was explained by NO synthesis-dependent flow (P < 0.005) and the percentage of forearm muscle (P < 0.005). We conclude that endothelial function (NO synthesis-dependent basal blood flow) and forearm muscularity are independent determinants of insulin-stimulated blood flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Utriainen et al. (1996) conducted a cross-sectional in Normal subjects (n=22). Physical fitness, limb muscularity, and endothelial function was evaluated on Insulin-stimulated blood flow (multiple R 0.72, p=<0.001). Endothelial function (NO synthesis-dependent flow) and forearm muscularity independently explained 52% of the variation in insulin-stimulated blood flow (multiple R=0.72, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: