Key result
Low-cost wireless PPG reliably measures pulse rate variability vs ECG, performing best while sitting.
Why the study?
There is a lack of in-depth understanding of the remote usage of photoplethysmography technology and its viability for underdeveloped countries.
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
Commercial low-cost PPG devices can reliably extract pulse rate variability parameters in real-time, especially in a sitting posture, offering an affordable solution for remote cardiovascular monitoring in low-resource settings.
Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals have been widely used in evaluating cardiovascular biomarkers, however, there is a lack of in-depth understanding of the remote usage of this technology and its viability for underdeveloped countries. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the performance of a low-cost wireless PPG device in detecting ultra-short-term time-domain pulse rate variability (PRV) parameters in different postures and breathing patterns. A total of 30 healthy subjects were recruited. ECG and PPG signals were simultaneously recorded in 3 min using miniaturized wearable sensors. Four heart rate variability (HRV) and PRV parameters were extracted from ECG and PPG signals, respectively, and compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Scheirer-Ray-Hare test with post hoc analysis. In addition, the data loss was calculated as the percentage of missing sampling points. Posture did not present statistical differences across the PRV parameters but a statistical difference between indicators was found. Strong variation was found for the RMSSD indicator in the standing posture. The sitting position in both breathing patterns demonstrated the lowest data loss (1.0 ± 0.6 and 1.0 ± 0.7) and the lowest percentage of different factors for all indicators. The usage of commercial PPG and BLE devices can allow the reliable extraction of the PPG signal and PRV indicators in real time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pineda-Alpizar et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in healthy subjects (n=30). Low-cost wireless photoplethysmography (PPG) device vs. Reference electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor was evaluated on Accuracy of time-domain pulse rate variability (PRV) parameters (HR, IBI, SDNN, RMSSD) compared to ECG. A low-cost wireless PPG device reliably extracted pulse rate variability parameters compared to ECG, with the sitting posture showing the highest reliability and lowest data loss.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: