Key result
A wearable PPG device demonstrated strong positive correlations for heart rate and moderate correlations for HRV indices compared to an ECG device among 22 nurses during a 60-minute work protocol.
Why the study?
Wearable photoplethysmography technology is gaining attention for heart rate and variability monitoring, but device performance during real working conditions remains questionable.
Does a wearable PPG device reliably measure heart rate and heart rate variability compared to an ECG device in nurses during working conditions?
Observational (n=22)
Does a wearable PPG device reliably measure heart rate and heart rate variability compared to an ECG device in nurses during working conditions?
Wearable PPG devices demonstrate good overall reliability for measuring heart rate and certain HRV indices compared to ECG in active working conditions.
PPG wearables may support real-world HR/HRV monitoring in nurses; pilot data leaves open larger validation trials.
The use of wearable photoplethysmography (PPG) technology for estimating heart rate (HR) and HR variability (HRV) in the health care system is gaining attention in recent years. However, the performance of these devices remains questionable in their ability to collect data in real working conditions for long-term monitoring. The present study aimed to examine the data collected from nurses during working hours by PPG and electrocardiography (ECG) devices. Twenty-two nurses underwent a 60-minute work protocol during the normal working conditions while wearing a PPG device and an ECG device. HR, low-frequency component (LF) and high-frequency component (HF), LF/HF ratio, and percent LF distribution in total spectral power, and steps were examined. Pearson's correlation analysis and Bland-Altman method was performed to examine the relationships between the two devices based on HR and HRV indices. The results found strong positive correlations between HR estimates of both devices, and moderate correlations between LF/HF ratio and percent LF indices estimates, respectively. Moreover, the Bland-Altman analysis showed a small mean bias in general between the captured data of both devices. This pilot study suggested that the PPG device appears to demonstrate good overall reliability in measuring HR, LF/HF ratio, and percent LF. A further large-scale study is required to investigate the feasibility and practicality for HR and HRV analysis in nurses during real working conditions using PPG devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Healthy nurses (occupational monitoring) (n=22). Wearable photoplethysmography (PPG) device vs. Electrocardiography (ECG) device was evaluated on Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) indices including LF/HF ratio and percent LF. A wearable PPG device demonstrated strong positive correlations for heart rate and moderate correlations for HRV indices compared to an ECG device among 22 nurses during a 60-minute work protocol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: