Key result
Higher PACIC chronic care scores linked to better treatment compliance in hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Few studies have examined the application of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care scale in China, and its relationship with hypertension compliance needed assessment.
Does higher patient-perceived quality of chronic illness care (PACIC) improve patient compliance (CHPS) in hypertensive patients in primary care?
Cross-Sectional (n=253)
Yes
Does higher patient-perceived quality of chronic illness care (PACIC) improve patient compliance (CHPS) in hypertensive patients in primary care?
A higher patient-assessed quality of chronic illness care based on the Chronic Care Model was associated with improved compliance among hypertensive patients in Chinese primary healthcare settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Association in Chinese primary care should not change practice; leaves open causal effects on hypertension compliance.
The Chronic Care Model (CCM) is a framework that supports the proactive, planned, coordinated and patient-centered care of chronic diseases. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scale is a valuable tool for evaluating patients’ perspectives on chronic care delivery based on the CCM. Few studies have examined its application in China. This study assesses hypertension care in Chinese patients and explores how PACIC scores relate to patient compliance. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Hangzhou, China, from June to August 2021, including 253 hypertensive patients from 5 county hospitals and 13 primary healthcare centers. The study used the PACIC scale to assess hypertension care delivery and the Compliance of Hypertensive Patients scale (CHPS) to measure patient compliance. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between demographic characteristics and the total and domain scores of PACIC, as well as the association between CHPS and the domain scores of PACIC. The mean value of overall the PACIC score was 3.12 (out of 5). Problem solving/contextual domain had the highest average score for each item, while follow up/coordination domain had the lowest. Patient activation had negative effects on intention (β = −.18, P < .05), attitude (β = −.21, P < .05), responsibility (β = −.17, P < .05), and the total score of CHPS (β = −.24, P < .01). Delivery system design/decision support was negatively associated with lifestyle (β = −.21, P < .05) and the total score of CHPS (β = −.26, P < .01). Hypertensive patients perceived that they sometimes received hypertension care consistent with the CCM in Chinese primary healthcare settings. A higher level of PACIC score was beneficial for improving hypertensive patient compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=253). Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scores vs. Lower PACIC scores was evaluated on Total score of Compliance of Hypertensive Patients scale (CHPS) (β = -0.26 for delivery system design/decision support, p=<0.01). Higher PACIC domain scores for patient activation (β = -0.24, p<0.01) and delivery system design/decision support (β = -0.26, p<0.01) were significantly associated with better treatment compliance.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: