Key result
High LAVi plus early recurrence linked to ~4.5-fold higher late post-ablation AF recurrence.
Why the study?
Traditional risk scores for recurrent AF after catheter ablation have limited discriminatory capacity, and incorporating cardiac imaging with deep learning may improve prediction accuracy.
Does high machine-learning-derived left atrial volume index combined with early recurrence predict late atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=653)
No
Does high machine-learning-derived left atrial volume index combined with early recurrence predict late atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
Hazard Ratio: 4.52 (95% CI 3.36–6.08)
p-value: p=<0.001
Deep learning-derived full volumetric LAVi from pre-procedural CT combined with early recurrence provides a highly discriminative model for identifying patients at high risk of late atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation.
May aid post-ablation AF recurrence risk stratification; extends prior models yet leaves open need for prospective validation.
Background Traditional risk scores for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation utilize readily available clinical and echocardiographic variables and yet have limited discriminatory capacity. Use of data from cardiac imaging and deep learning may help improve accuracy and prediction of recurrent AF after ablation. Methods We evaluated patients with symptomatic, drug‐refractory AF undergoing catheter ablation. All patients underwent pre‐ablation cardiac computed tomography (cCT). LAVi was computed using a deep‐learning algorithm. In a two‐step analysis, random survival forest (RSF) was used to generate prognostic models with variables of highest importance, followed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the selected variables. Events of interest included early and late recurrence. Results Among 653 patients undergoing AF ablation, the most important factors associated with late recurrence by RSF analysis at 24 (+/−18) months follow‐up included LAVi and early recurrence. In total, 5 covariates were identified as independent predictors of late recurrence: LAVi (HR per mL/m 2 1.01 [1.01–1.02]; p < .001), early recurrence (HR 2.42 [1.90–3.09]; p < .001), statin use (HR 1.38 [1.09–1.75]; p = .007), beta‐blocker use (HR 1.29 [1.01–1.65]; p = .043), and adjunctive cavotricuspid isthmus ablation [HR 0.74 (0.57–0.96); p = .02]. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with both LAVi >66.7 mL/m 2 and early recurrence had the highest risk of late recurrence risk compared with those with LAVi <66.7 mL/m 2 and no early recurrence (HR 4.52 [3.36–6.08], p < .001). Conclusions Machine learning‐derived, full volumetric LAVi from cCT is the most important pre‐procedural risk factor for late AF recurrence following catheter ablation. The combination of increased LAVi and early recurrence confers more than a four‐fold increased risk of late recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brahier et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (n=653). High machine learning-derived left atrial volume index (>66.7 mL/m2) and early recurrence vs. LAVi <66.7 mL/m2 and no early recurrence was evaluated on Late atrial fibrillation recurrence (HR 4.52, 95% CI 3.36-6.08, p=<0.001). The combination of high machine learning-derived left atrial volume index (>66.7 mL/m2) and early recurrence increased the risk of late atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation by more than four-fold (HR 4.52).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: