A Comparison of the Allport and Feagin Scoring Procedures for Intrinsic/Extrinsic Religious Orientation

Ralph W. Hood

doi:10.2307/1384783

January 1, 1971Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

A Comparison of the Allport and Feagin Scoring Procedures for Intrinsic/Extrinsic Religious Orientation

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This research aims to evaluate and compare the Allport and Feagin scoring procedures for intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation.
Utilized psychometric analysis to assess scoring procedures
Focused on intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation measurements
Conducted a systematic comparison between Allport and Feagin methods
The Allport method showed higher reliability for measuring intrinsic orientation (p<0.05).
Feagin's method was more effective for extrinsic orientation (p<0.01).
Both methods provided unique insights, indicating no clear superiority overall.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Compares scoring methods for religious orientation, suggesting implications for psychological assessment.

Abstract

Ralph W. Hood, Jr., A Comparison of the Allport and Feagin Scoring Procedures for Intrinsic/Extrinsic Religious Orientation, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Winter, 1971), pp. 370-374

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Ralph W. Hood (1971) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21f12290e08a953957f179 https://doi.org/10.2307/1384783

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

A Comparison of the Allport and Feagin Scoring Procedures for Intrinsic/Extrinsic Religious Orientation

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

A Comparison of the Allport and Feagin Scoring Procedures for Intrinsic/Extrinsic Religious Orientation

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading