May 1, 1994

Game Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review: A Revisionist Analysis of Marbury v. Madison

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Robert Lowry Clinton, Game Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review: A Revisionist Analysis of Marbury v. Madison, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 38, No. 2 (May, 1994), pp. 285-302

KI fragen

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Robert Clinton (Sun,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21f68990e08a953957f721 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2111405

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The Law's Conscience: Equitable Constitutionalism in America.1992 · 22 citations
2The Jeffersonian Crisis: Courts and Politics in the Young Republic.1972 · 84 citations
3The Rise of Modern Judicial from Constitutional Interpretation to Judge-Made Law, <i>by Christopher Wolfe</i>1987 · 29 citations
4The American Doctrine of Judicial Supremacy1914 · 16 citations
5Games as Models of Social Phenomena1979 · 135 citations

KI fragen

Bookmark