Why the study?
What is the prevalence of high blood pressure in Brazilian adolescents and how do methodological procedures affect these estimates?
What is the prevalence of high blood pressure in Brazilian adolescents and how do methodological procedures affect these estimates?
The wide variability in the estimated prevalence of high blood pressure among Brazilian adolescents (2.5% to 30.9%) is significantly influenced by the methodological quality of blood pressure measurement procedures.
May overestimate hypertension prevalence among Brazilian adolescents when BP measurement quality is low; challenges reliability of prior estimates and supports standardized protocols.
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on studies that estimated the prevalence of high blood pressure (HBP) or systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) in Brazilian adolescents, considering the employed methodological procedures. METHODS: Bibliographical research of prevalence studies of HBP/SAH in adolescents from 1995 to 2010. The search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed/Medline, Lilacs, SciELO, and Isi Adolec. The descriptors "hypertension", "BP", "teen", "students", "cross-sectional", "prevalence" and "Brazil" were used in Portuguese and English. Furthermore, a score ranging from 0 to 18 based on Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals and the VI Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension was elaborated, in order to analyze the procedures used to measure BP in studies. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles were identified, mostly published in the last 10 years, and 90.5% were performed in school-based and regions of the Southeast, Northeast and South. The prevalence of HBP/SAH ranged from 2.5 to 30.9%. The score of the studies ranged from 0 to 16. A significant negative correlation (rho = -0.504; p = 0.020) was observed between the prevalence of HBP/SAH and the score of BP measurement quality. CONCLUSION: The great variability of PAE/SAH estimates appears to be influenced by methodological procedures used in the studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magalhães et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: