Why the study?
Does continuity of care improve the diagnosis of hypertension in pediatric patients?
Does continuity of care improve the diagnosis of hypertension in pediatric patients?
Continuity of care does not significantly affect the diagnosis rate of hypertension in pediatric patients, suggesting other approaches are needed to address underdiagnosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuity of care was not associated with pediatric hypertension diagnosis; leaves open whether alternative strategies improve detection.
Hypertension among pediatric patients is an underdiagnosed condition. As continuity of care has been found to increase quality of pediatric care, we undertook this study to assess effect of continuity on diagnosis of pediatric hypertension. This is a retrospective analysis of 774 hypertensive patients, ages 3-18 years between June 1999 and October 2007 within the MetroHealth System in northeastern Ohio. The proportion of hypertensive patients diagnosed was assessed using coding within the electronic medical record. Continuity was assessed using the usual provider of care, defined as the number of visits to the most frequent provider divided by the total number of visits in the study period. Overall continuity did not have a statistically significant association with diagnosis (OR 0.7, CI 0.4-1.4). Our research indicates that continuity does not significantly affect diagnosis of hypertension in pediatric patients. Other approaches should be investigated to improve the significant underdiagnosis of pediatric hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benson et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: