Key result
Patients with atrial fibrillation exhibited significant knowledge gaps regarding stroke prevention, leading to a preference for aspirin over oral anticoagulants due to fears of bleeding and lifestyle disruptions.
Why the study?
Despite guidelines recommending oral anticoagulants over aspirin for stroke prevention in AF, underuse of OACs remains common globally, particularly in Asia.
Patients' knowledge gap regarding AF management and fear of bleeding are major barriers to switching from aspirin to oral anticoagulants, highlighting the need for targeted educational interventions to encourage shared decision-making.
Knowledge gaps may drive aspirin preference in AF; leaves open whether education improves anticoagulant uptake.
BACKGROUND: Despite international treatment guidelines currently advocating oral anticoagulants (OACs) as the only appropriate stroke prevention therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and evidence that OACs can greatly reduce the risk of stroke with similar risk of bleeding compared with aspirin, the underuse of OACs in patients with AF is common globally, especially in Asia. This study aimed to identify the barriers to prescribing and using OACs among long-term aspirin users with AF. METHOD: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with fourteen eligible patients with AF using a semi-structured interview guide. The interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and data was analyzed according to the principles of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Five themes were developed: awareness of AF symptoms and diagnosis; knowledge and understanding of AF and stroke prevention therapy; role of decision-making in prescribing; willingness to switch from aspirin to OACs; and impact of OAC regimen on daily living. The majority of the patients were not aware of the symptoms and diagnosis of AF and only had a vague understanding of the illness and stroke prevention therapy, leading to their minimal involvement in decisions relating to their treatment. Some patients and their caregivers were particularly concerned about the bleeding complications from OACs and perceived aspirin to be a suitable alternative as they find the adverse effects from aspirin manageable and so preferred to remain on aspirin if switching to OACs was not compulsory. Lastly, the lifestyle modifications required when using warfarin, e.g. alternative dosing regimen, diet restriction, were seen as barriers to some patients and caregivers. CONCLUSION: The findings revealed patients' knowledge gap in AF management which may be targeted using educational interventions to improve patients' understanding of AF and its management and hence encourage active participation in the decision-making of their treatment in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2020) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=14). Oral anticoagulants vs. Aspirin was evaluated on Barriers to prescribing and using oral anticoagulants. Patients with atrial fibrillation exhibited significant knowledge gaps regarding stroke prevention, leading to a preference for aspirin over oral anticoagulants due to fears of bleeding and lifestyle disruptions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: