Why the study?
There is limited evidence on the patient role in the uptake of direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation beyond demographic and clinical characteristics.
What are the patient perspectives on factors affecting DOAC use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation?
What are the patient perspectives on factors affecting DOAC use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation?
Greater patient involvement in decision-making regarding oral anticoagulant therapy could improve patient satisfaction, adherence, and DOAC uptake.
INTRODUCTION: Oral anticoagulant therapy choices for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) expanded in the last decade with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). However, the implementation of DOACs was slow and varied across different health economies in England. There is limited evidence on the patient role in the uptake of new medicines, including DOACs, apart from considering their demographic and clinical characteristics. Hence, this study aimed to address the gap by exploring the view of patients with AF on factors affecting DOAC use. METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted in three health economies in the North of England. Adult patients (>18 years) diagnosed with non-valvular AF, prescribed an oral anticoagulant (vitamin K antagonist or DOAC), and able to give written consent were recruited. Data were collected between August 2018 and April 2019. Audio recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the framework method. RESULTS: Four themes with eleven subthemes discussed identified factors affecting the use of DOACs. They were linked to limited healthcare financial and workforce resources, patient involvement in decision-making, patient knowledge about DOACs, safety concerns about oral anticoagulants, and oral anticoagulant therapy impact on patients' daily lives. Lack of a) opportunities to voice patient preferences and b) information on available therapy options resulted in some patients experiencing difficulties with the prescribed therapy. This was reported to cause negative impact on their daily lives, adherence, and overall satisfaction with the therapy. CONCLUSION: Greater patient involvement in decision-making could prevent and resolve difficulties encountered by some patients and potentially improve outcomes plus increase the uptake of DOACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medlinskiene et al. (2021) studied non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs. Vitamin K antagonist was evaluated on Factors affecting DOAC use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: