Key result
DAPT de-escalation at 3 months shows no benefit over standard therapy for 1-year NACEs.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the effects of different DAPT regimens in patients with ACS undergoing PCI to identify the most efficient strategy to reduce ischemic and bleeding risks.
Does DAPT de-escalation therapy reduce net adverse clinical events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=1,598)
No
Does DAPT de-escalation therapy reduce net adverse clinical events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
De-escalating DAPT at 3 months post-PCI in ACS patients yielded comparable net clinical outcomes to 12 months of standard therapy, presenting a viable strategy to manage bleeding risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Similar NACE with 3-month de-escalation was associated with potential bleeding benefit; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
To investigate the effect of different DAPTs in patients with ACS undergoing PCI, and to identify the most efficient DAPT to reduce the risk of ischemia and bleeding after PCI. Between March 2017 and December 2021, 1598 patients with ACS who underwent PCI were included in the study. The DAPT protocol included the clopidogrel group (aspirin 100 mg + clopidogrel 75 mg), ticagrelor group (aspirin 100 mg + ticagrelor 90 mg), de-escalation Group 1 (reduced dose of ticagrelor [from 90 mg to 60 mg]) after 3 months of oral DAPT [aspirin 100 mg + ticagrelor 90 mg]), and de-escalation Group 2 (switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel after 3 months of oral DAPT [aspirin 100 mg + ticagrelor 90 mg]). All patients received a 12-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACEs) that included the composite endpoints of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stroke, and bleeding events. There were 2 secondary endpoints, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and bleeding. No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of NACEs between the 4 groups at the average 12-month follow-up (15.7% vs 19.2% vs 16.7% vs 20.4%). Cox regression analysis revealed that DAPT ticagrelor group regimen (hazard ratio [HR] 0.547; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.334-0.896; P = .017) were associated with a lower risk of MACCEs. Age (HR 1.024; 95% CI: 1.003-1.046; P = .022). DAPT de-escalation Group 2 regimen (HR 1.665; 95% CI: 1.001-2.767; P = .049) were marginally associated with a higher risk of MACCEs. Ticagrelor group regimen (HR 1.856; 95% CI: 1.376-2.504; P < .001) was associated with higher risk of bleeding events. Ticagrelor group regimen (HR 1.606; 95% CI: 1.179-2.187; P = .003) were associated with a higher risk of minor bleeding events. For patients with ACS underwent PCI, there were no significant difference in the incidence of NACEs between 3 and 12 months after PCI between de-escalation and non-de-escalation therapies. Compared with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT, there was no significant difference in MACCEs and bleeding events in patients receiving de-escalation treatment (ticagrelor reduction from 90 to 60 mg, 3 months after PCI).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=1,598). DAPT de-escalation (reduced dose of ticagrelor or switched to clopidogrel after 3 months) vs. Standard 12-month DAPT (aspirin + ticagrelor or aspirin + clopidogrel) was evaluated on Net adverse clinical events (NACEs), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stroke, and bleeding events (15.7% (Clopidogrel) vs 19.2% (Ticagrelor) vs 16.7% (De-escalation 1) vs 20.4% (De-escalation 2), p=0.281). In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI, DAPT de-escalation at 3 months resulted in no significant difference in net adverse clinical events at 12 months compared to standard therapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: