Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In an attempt to more clearly understand the erosion of motivation in some readers, a number of researchers (Mohr, 2006 Mohr, K. 2006. Children's choices for recreational reading: A three-part investigation of selection, preferences, rationales, and processes. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1): 181–104. [Google Scholar]; Smith & Wilhelm, 2002 Smith, M. and Wilhelm, J. 2002. Reading don't fix no Chevy's: Literacy in the lives of young men, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. [Google Scholar]) and organizations (The Education Alliance, 2007 Education Alliance. (2007). Gender differences in reading achievement: Policy implications and best practices http://www.educationalliance.org/Downloads/Research/GenderDifferences.pdf (Accessed: 25 July 2007). [Google Scholar]) have called for the investigation of gender differences in all readers, including young children. Consequently, this study focused on younger, average achieving readers. Specifically, 288 third-grade average readers were studied. Two constructs consistent with expectancy-value theory (Eccles, 1983 Eccles, J. 1983. “Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors”. In Achievement and achievement motives, Edited by: Spence, J. T. 75–146. San Francisco, CA: Freeman. [Google Scholar]), self-concept as a reader and value of reading, were examined. The results suggest that third-grade boys and girls who are average readers are equally self-confident about their reading ability; however, boys value reading less than girls. This finding sheds new light on the complexities of motivation and gender differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marinak et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: