A common characteristic in many quality assurance schemes around the world is their implicit and often narrowly formulated understanding of how organisational change is to take place as a result of the process. By identifying some of the underlying assumptions related to organisational change in current quality assurance schemes, the aim of this paper is to discuss the relevance of these assumptions in the light of more recent insights from organisational theory. It is argued that the whole field of quality assurance will benefit from the creation of a more realistic picture of how organisational change takes place in that this may provide (1) a more nuanced view on expected outcomes of quality assurance and (2) more refined quality assurance schemes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bj⊘rn Stensaker (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: