Key result
Coronary revascularization did not improve arterial stiffness or flow-mediated vasodilatation at 6 months, but significantly reduced left ventricular mass index (-12%, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does coronary revascularization improve arterial stiffness and endothelial function in patients with significant coronary artery stenosis?
Observational (n=39)
Does coronary revascularization improve arterial stiffness and endothelial function in patients with significant coronary artery stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Coronary revascularization improves local cardiac parameters such as LVMI and diastolic function but does not reverse systemic arterial stiffness or endothelial dysfunction.
BACKGROUND: In patients with myocardial ischemia and coronary atherosclerosis, arterial stiffness and endothelial function are impaired. Whether these alterations can be favorably affected by successful coronary revascularization is debated. METHODS: We studied 39 hospitalized patients 59.3 ± 3.2 years old (mean ± SEM). In 21 patients with angiographic evidence of significant coronary artery stenosis, revascularization procedures were performed (stenting n = 11 and bypass surgery n = 10). The remaining patients had no significant stenosis and thus served as controls. Prerevascularization measurements included carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), radial artery flow-mediated vasodilatation and a complete echocardiographic examination. The same measurements were performed 6 months later. Pharmacological treatment consisted of different cardiovascular drugs and remained substantially unchanged over the 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: With the exception of an increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI; 130 ± 5.3 versus 105.8 ± 7.2 g/m(2), P < 0.05) and a lower Em/Am (0.6 ± 0.01 and 0.8 ± 0.01 respectively, P < 0.05) observed in patients with coronary stenosis, all other hemodynamic, cardiac and vascular variables were similar in the two groups. Following the 6-month follow-up period, all variables remained substantially unchanged, with the exception, in revascularized patients, of a significant reduction in LVMI (-12%, P < 0.05) and an improvement in Tissue Doppler Imaging-measured diastolic function (Em/Am + 30%, P < 0.05). This was not associated, however, with any significant change in PWV and in flow-mediated vasodilatation. CONCLUSION: Cardiac revascularization has no effect on arterial function, assessed either as arterial stiffness or as flow-mediated vasodilatation. On the contrary, the improvement in coronary blood flow triggers local cardiac changes, namely, a reduction in LVMI and an improvement in diastolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giannattasio et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Myocardial ischemia and coronary atherosclerosis (n=39). Coronary revascularization vs. Patients with no significant coronary stenosis was evaluated on Arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity), flow-mediated vasodilatation, and cardiac changes (LVMI, Em/Am) (p=<0.05). Coronary revascularization did not improve arterial stiffness or flow-mediated vasodilatation at 6 months, but significantly reduced left ventricular mass index (-12%, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: