Key result
Long-term patency after recanalization of chronic coronary occlusions significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared to reocclusion (change of 0.05 vs 0.01; P=0.04).
Why the study?
Does successful recanalization of chronic coronary occlusions improve left ventricular ejection fraction and regional radial shortening in patients with angina pectoris or exercise-induced ischaemia?
Population
95 patients with angina pectoris or exercise-induced ischaemia with a successfully recanalized chronic…
Comparison
Successful angioplasty/recanalization of chronic… vs Baseline measurements and patients with…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
6.7 +/- 1.4 months
Authors
Loading...
May support LV recovery after CTO angioplasty; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without RCTs.
Cohort (n=95)
Does successful recanalization of chronic coronary occlusions improve left ventricular ejection fraction and regional radial shortening in patients with angina pectoris or exercise-induced ischaemia?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.05% vs 0.01%
p-value: p=0.04
Successful recanalization of chronic coronary occlusions is associated with significant improvements in global and regional left ventricular function at 6 months, provided the artery remains patent.
Per Anton Sirnes (1998) conducted a cohort in Chronic coronary occlusions with angina pectoris or exercise-induced ischaemia (n=95). Patent artery after recanalization vs. Reocclusion was evaluated on Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.04). Long-term patency after recanalization of chronic coronary occlusions significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared to reocclusion (change of 0.05 vs 0.01; P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: