Key result
Volunteer-delivered lifestyle modification programs were similarly effective to professional-delivered programs in improving chronic disease biometric outcomes, with minimal effect size differences (Cohen's d 0.1-0.2).
Why the study?
The Coronary Health Improvement Program has been delivered by both paid professional and unpaid volunteer facilitators, but participant outcomes of each delivery mode had not been compared.
Does a volunteer-delivered lifestyle intervention improve biometric outcomes as effectively as a professional-delivered program in adults?
Observational (n=10,273)
Yes
Does a volunteer-delivered lifestyle intervention improve biometric outcomes as effectively as a professional-delivered program in adults?
Effect estimate: Cohen's d 0.1-0.2
p-value: p=<0.001
Volunteer-delivered lifestyle modification programs are as effective as those delivered by paid professionals in improving chronic disease biometric outcomes.
Volunteer programs may offer scalable support for chronic disease management; this Level 3 evidence leaves open the need for RCTs to confirm equivalence.
PURPOSE: Lifestyle modification programs have been shown to effectively treat chronic disease. The Coronary Health Improvement Program has been delivered by both paid professional and unpaid volunteer facilitators. This study compared participant outcomes of each mode in the United States. DESIGN: Pre-/post-analysis of CHIP interventions delivered between 1999 and 2012. SETTING: Professional-delivered programs in Rockford Illinois 1999-2004 and volunteer-delivered programs across North America 2005-2012. SUBJECTS: Adults ≥21 years (professional programs N = 3158 34.3% men, mean age = 54.0 ± 11.4 years; volunteer programs N = 7115 33.4% men, mean age = 57.4 ± 13.0 years). MEASURES: Body mass index, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), blood lipid profile (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein), and fasting plasma glucose. ANALYSIS: Analysis of Covariance, with adjustment for age, gender, BMI change and baseline biometric and effect sizes. RESULTS: < .001). However, the effect size differences between the groups were minimal (Cohen's d .1-.2). CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle modification programs have been shown to effectively treat chronic disease. The Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) lifestyle intervention has been delivered by both paid professional and unpaid volunteer facilitators. This study compared selected chronic disease biometric outcomes of participants in each mode in the United States. It found volunteer-delivered programs do not appear to be any less effective than programs delivered by paid professionals, which is noteworthy as volunteers may provide important social capital in the combat of chronic disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kent et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Chronic disease risk factors (n=10,273). Volunteer-delivered Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) vs. Professional-delivered Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) was evaluated on Biometric outcomes including BMI, blood pressure, blood lipid profile, and fasting plasma glucose (Cohen's d 0.1-0.2, p=<0.001). Volunteer-delivered lifestyle modification programs were similarly effective to professional-delivered programs in improving chronic disease biometric outcomes, with minimal effect size differences (Cohen's d 0.1-0.2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: