Key result
Agomelatine is linked to higher heart rate variability in CAD patients with depression.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine heart rate variability in depressed patients with chronic CAD and to assess the effects of agomelatine on heart rate variability.
Does agomelatine improve heart rate variability in patients with coronary artery disease and depression?
Cohort (n=74)
No
Does agomelatine improve heart rate variability in patients with coronary artery disease and depression?
Absolute Event Rate: 36.5% vs 26.5%
p-value: p=0.02
Treating comorbid depression with agomelatine in patients with coronary artery disease improves autonomic function (heart rate variability), potentially reducing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias.
May support autonomic benefits with agomelatine in depressed CAD; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
Aim . To determine heart rate variability (HRV) in depressed patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and to assess the effects of agomelatine on HRV. Methods . 74 patients with CAD (class 3-4 angina pectoris) were recruited in a study. Patients (n = 45) with CAD and depression were assigned to Group 1, whereas CAD patients (n = 29) without any signs of depression were assigned to Group 2. 17 patients received agomelatine (Subgroup 1) and 28 patients did not take any antidepressants (Subgroup 2). HRV was measured using SCHILLER MT-200 Holter-ECG apparatus at baseline and after 6 months. Results . Patients with depression demonstrated a significant decrease in HRV compared to non-depressed patients (pNN50% (3.9 [2.2; 5.4] vs 5.7 [2.9; 12.6], p = 0.03), SDANN (81 [63; 97] ms vs 91 [79; 102] ms, p = 0.06), SDNNindx (46 [36; 56] ms vs 55 [48; 66] ms, p = 0.002), rMSSD (28 [21; 36] ms vs 33 [ 29; 45] ms, p = 0.02), SDNN (97 [75; 121] ms vs 110 [98; 127] ms, p = 0.02). Subgroups 1 and 2 did not differ in HRV (p>0.05). After 6 months, significant differences in the following parameters were found in those patients who received agomelatine therapy and those who did not: rMSSD (36.5 [28.5; 51] ms vs 26.5 [25; 32] ms, p = 0.02), SDANN (88 [72,5; 114,5] ms vs 67,5 [58; 83] ms, p = 0.03), SDNN strives to a significant difference - 100 [87; 133.5] ms vs 85.5 [75; 103] ms, p = 0.07. Conclusion . HRV significantly decreased in depressed patients with CAD suggesting autonomic dysfunction and worsening their prognosis. Agomelatine therapy in patients with CAD is effective in treating heart rate variability and reducing the risk of developing life-threatening arrhythmias.Key
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Нонка et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease and depression (n=74). Agomelatine vs. No antidepressant therapy was evaluated on rMSSD at 6 months (p=0.02). Agomelatine therapy over 6 months significantly increased heart rate variability parameters, such as rMSSD, in patients with coronary artery disease and depression compared to those not taking antidepressants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: