Key result
Dual-chamber pacing did not significantly improve quality of life or clinical outcomes compared with ventricular pacing in elderly patients.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LAMAS, GERVASIO A.; ORAV, E. JOHN; STAMBLER, BRUCE S.; ELLENBOGEN, KENNETH A.; SGARBOSSA, ELENA B.; HUANG, SHOEI K. STEPHEN; MARINCHAK, ROGER A.; MARK ESTES, N. A. III; MITCHELL, GARY F.; LIEBERMAN, ERIC H.; MANGIONE, CAROL M.; GOLDMAN, LEE FOR THE PACEMAKER SELECTION IN THE ELDERLY INVESTIGATORS Author Information
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamas et al. (1999) studied this question. Dual-chamber pacing did not significantly improve quality of life or clinical outcomes compared with ventricular pacing in elderly patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: