Why the study?
What is the prevalence, effectiveness of screening methods, and clinical outcome of pre-clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy in adults with diabetes?
What is the prevalence, effectiveness of screening methods, and clinical outcome of pre-clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy in adults with diabetes?
Pre-clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy is common and associated with an increased risk of functional deterioration and cardiovascular events, with BNP serving as an independent predictor of future events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diabetic cardiomyopathy may warrant closer monitoring in diabetes; this Level 3 evidence leaves open BNP-guided risk stratification.
AIMS: Diabetic cardiomyopathy, characterized by left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and LV hypertrophy independent of myocardial ischaemia and hypertension, could contribute to the increased life-time risk of congestive heart failure seen in patients with diabetes. We assessed prospectively the prevalence, effectiveness of screening methods [brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and C-reactive protein in combination with clinical parameters], and outcome of pre-clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 100 adults (mean age 57.4 +/- 10.2 years, 44% females) with diabetes and no previous evidence of structural heart disease. By echocardiography, diabetic cardiomyopathy was present in 48% of patients. Screening with combinations of clinical parameters (gender, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index), but not BNP, resulted in high negative predictive values for diabetic cardiomyopathy. During a mean follow-up of 48.5 +/- 9.0 months, in the groups with and without diabetic cardiomyopathy, 12.5 vs. 3.9% (P < 0.2) patients died or experienced cardiovascular events and 37.5 vs. 9.6% (P < 0.002) had a deterioration in NYHA functional class. Overall event-free survival was 54 vs. 87% (P = 0.001) in the groups with and without diabetic cardiomyopathy, respectively. Brain natriuretic peptide was an independent predictor of events [odds ratio 3.5 (1.1-10.9), P = 0.02]. CONCLUSION: Pre-clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy is common. Screening with combinations of simple clinical parameters, but not BNP, can be useful to identify those patients needing further evaluation. Patients with pre-clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy are at increased risk for functional deterioration and possibly cardiovascular events during follow-up. Brain natriuretic peptide was shown to be an independent predictor of future events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiencke et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: