Among 471 surveyed North American colorectal surgeons, 100% use mechanical bowel preparation and 86.5% add both oral and parenteral antibiotics to the regimen.
Cross-Sectional (n=471)
Yes
What are the current practices of preoperative bowel preparation among North American colorectal surgeons?
The survey highlights that mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral and parenteral antibiotics is the predominant practice among North American colorectal surgeons.
In North America, the rate of infections following colorectal surgery decreased after the introduction of oral antibiotic bowel preparation against colonic microflora. Eight hundred eight board-certified colorectal surgeons were surveyed for their current bowel preparation practices before elective procedures. The 471 responders (58%) all use mechanical preparation: oral polyethylene glycol solution (70.9% of the respondents), oral sodium phosphate solution with or without bisacodyl (28.4%), and "traditional" methods of dietary restriction, cathartics, and enemas (28.4%). Most surgeons (86.5%) add oral and parenteral antibiotics to the regimen; 11.5% add only parenteral antibiotics, 1.1% add only oral antibiotics, and 0.9% add no antibiotics. Generally (77.8% of cases), oral neomycin and erythromycin or metronidazole are combined with a perioperative parenteral antibiotic. Most individuals start the preparation as outpatients the day before surgery, and the parenteral drugs are added to the regimen 1-2 hours before the procedure. The use of outpatient bowel preparation is increasing; however, patient selection is critical, and education is needed to reduce the rate of complications.
Nichols et al. (Tue,) conducted a cross-sectional in Elective colorectal surgery (n=471). Preoperative bowel preparation was evaluated on Current bowel preparation practices. Among 471 surveyed North American colorectal surgeons, 100% use mechanical bowel preparation and 86.5% add both oral and parenteral antibiotics to the regimen.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: