Key result
Diagnosis and treatment of microvascular endothelial dysfunction in patients with non-obstructive CAD was associated with a better overall mental composite score (44.8 vs 40.9, p=0.036).
Why the study?
Angina with non-obstructive CAD is common and impairs quality of life, prompting the hypothesis that evaluating, diagnosing, and treating coronary endothelial dysfunction improves quality of life.
Does diagnosis and treatment of microvascular endothelial dysfunction improve quality of life in patients with chest pain and non-obstructive CAD?
Cohort (n=457)
Does diagnosis and treatment of microvascular endothelial dysfunction improve quality of life in patients with chest pain and non-obstructive CAD?
Diagnosis and treatment of coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction in patients with angina and non-obstructive CAD is associated with improved long-term quality of life.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for QoL gains from microvascular dysfunction evaluation in non-obstructive CAD; randomized trials needed before practice change.
Aim: Angina pectoris in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is common and is associated with poor quality of life (QOL). Coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction is associated with myocardial ischaemia and is a common cause of angina. We hypothesise that evaluation of coronary endothelial function, its diagnosis and treatment will favourably impact QOL in patients with angina symptoms and non-obstructive CAD. Methods and results: Follow-up was done on 457 patients with chest pain and non-obstructive coronary arteries who had undergone coronary vascular reactivity evaluation by administration of intracoronary acetylcholine at the time of diagnostic study. After a mean follow-up of 8.4±4.7 years, QOL was assessed by administration of the SF-36 QOL survey. Patients diagnosed and treated for microvascular endothelial dysfunction had a higher (better) overall mental composite score (44.8 vs 40.9, p=0.036) and mental health score (44.2 vs 40.7, p=0.047), and a trend towards higher vitality scores (39.1 vs 35.9, p=0.053) and role emotional scores (43.6 vs 40.4, p=0.073), compared with patients with normal endothelial function. Conclusion: Among patients with chest pain and normal coronaries, diagnosis and treatment of coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction in those with angina pectoris and non-obstructive CAD are associated with better QOL compared with patients with normal endothelial function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reriani et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Angina pectoris and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (n=457). Diagnosis and treatment of microvascular endothelial dysfunction vs. Normal endothelial function was evaluated on Overall mental composite score on the SF-36 QOL survey (p=0.036). Diagnosis and treatment of microvascular endothelial dysfunction in patients with non-obstructive CAD was associated with a better overall mental composite score (44.8 vs 40.9, p=0.036).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: