Key result
Ablating isolated RVOT scars in athletes with VT is linked to ~91% success versus subtricuspid scars.
Why the study?
High-level endurance training is linked to RV remodeling and VT, but the arrhythmogenic substrate in athletes is unknown.
Does the electroanatomic scar pattern (isolated subepicardial RVOT vs subtricuspid RV) predict ablation success and VT recurrence in patients with scar-related right ventricular VT?
Cohort (n=57)
Does the electroanatomic scar pattern (isolated subepicardial RVOT vs subtricuspid RV) predict ablation success and VT recurrence in patients with scar-related right ventricular VT?
Absolute Event Rate: 91% vs 57%
p-value: p=0.034
Isolated subepicardial RVOT scar in endurance athletes represents a distinct arrhythmogenic substrate for fast VT that is highly amenable to catheter ablation with excellent long-term outcomes compared to other RV scar patterns.
Subepicardial scar may inform ablation prognosis in scar-related RV VT; hypothesis-generating for substrate-specific strategies pending validation.
BACKGROUND: High-level endurance training has been associated with right ventricular pathological remodeling and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although overlap with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) has been suggested, the arrhythmogenic substrate for VTs in athletes is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether electroanatomic scar patterns related to sustained VT can distinguish exercise-induced arrhythmogenic remodeling from ARVC and post-inflammatory cardiomyopathies. METHODS: In 57 consecutive patients (mean age 48 ± 16 years; 83% male) undergoing catheter ablation for scar-related right ventricular VT, 2 distinct scar distributions were identified: 1) scars involving the subtricuspid right ventricle in 46 patients (group A); and 2) scars restricted to the anterior subepicardial right ventricular outflow tract in 11 patients (group B). RESULTS: Definite ARVC or post-inflammatory cardiomyopathy was diagnosed in 40 (87%) of 46 group A patients but was not diagnosed in any patients in group B. All group B patients underwent intensive endurance training for a median of 15 h/week (interquartile range [IQR]: 10 to 20 h/week) for a median of 13 years (IQR: 10 to 18 years). The cycle lengths of scar-related VTs were significantly faster in group B patients (257 ± 34 ms vs. 328 ± 72 ms in group A; p = 0.003). Catheter ablation resulted in complete procedural success in 10 (91%) of 11 group B patients compared with 26 (57%) of 46 group A patients (p = 0.034). During a median follow-up of 27 months (IQR: 6 to 62 months), 50% of group A patients but none of the group B patients had a VT recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a novel clinical entity of an isolated subepicardial right ventricular outflow tract scar serving as a substrate for fast VT in high-level endurance athletes that can be successfully treated by ablation. This scar pattern may allow distinguishing exercise-induced arrhythmogenic remodeling from ARVC and post-inflammatory cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venlet et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Scar-related right ventricular ventricular tachycardia (n=57). Isolated subepicardial right ventricular outflow tract scar vs. Subtricuspid right ventricle scar was evaluated on Complete procedural success of catheter ablation (p=0.034). Isolated subepicardial RV outflow tract scars in athletes with VT had higher ablation success (91% vs 57%, p=0.034) and no VT recurrences compared to subtricuspid scars.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: