Key result
Adjusting for clinical covariates attenuated or eliminated the apparent declines in 30-day mortality for heart failure and pneumonia identified using claims-based risk-adjustment models.
Why the study?
Apparent declines in mortality reported in prior studies using claims-based risk adjustment may be influenced by changes in coding practices rather than true reductions.
Do clinical risk-adjustment models alter the observed temporal trends in 30-day mortality compared to claims-based models in veterans hospitalized with heart failure or pneumonia?
Observational (n=278,249)
Yes
Do clinical risk-adjustment models alter the observed temporal trends in 30-day mortality compared to claims-based models in veterans hospitalized with heart failure or pneumonia?
Apparent declines in 30-day mortality for heart failure and pneumonia observed with claims-based risk adjustment are attenuated or eliminated when using clinical covariates, highlighting the limitations of claims data for assessing mortality trends.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Claims-based models may overestimate mortality declines in HF and pneumonia; challenges their reliability for trend assessment in observational data.
Importance: Prior studies have reported declines in mortality for patients admitted to Veterans Health Administration (VA) and non-VA hospitals using claims-based risk adjustment. These apparent mortality reductions may be influenced by changes in coding practices. Objective: To compare trends in the VA for 30-day mortality following hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and pneumonia using claims-based and clinical risk-adjustment models. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational time-trend study analyzed admissions to a VA Medical Center with a principal diagnosis of HF, pneumonia, or sepsis/respiratory failure (RF) with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia. Exclusion criteria included having less than 12 months of VA enrollment, being discharged alive within 24 hours, leaving against medical advice, and hospice utilization. Exposures: Admission to a VA hospital from January 2009 through September 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 30-day, all-cause mortality. All models included age and sex. Claims-based covariates included 22 (30) comorbidities for HF (pneumonia). Clinical covariates included vital signs, laboratory values, and ejection fraction. Results: Among the 146 924 HF admissions, the mean (SD) age was 71.6 (11.4) years and 144 502 (98.4%) were men; among the 131 325 admissions for pneumonia, the mean (SD) age was 70.8 (12.3) years and 127 491 (97.1%) were men. Unadjusted 30-day mortality rates were 6.45% (HF) and 11.22% (pneumonia). Claims-based models showed an increased predicted risk of 30-day mortality over time (0.019 percentage points per quarter for HF [95% CI, 0.015 to 0.023]; 0.053 percentage points per quarter for pneumonia [95% CI, 0.043 to 0.063]). Clinical models showed declines or no change in predicted risk (-0.014 percentage points per quarter for HF [95% CI, -0.020 to -0.008]; -0.004 percentage points per quarter for pneumonia [95% CI, -0.017 to 0.008]). Claims-based risk adjustment yielded declines in 30-day mortality of 0.051 percentage points per quarter for HF (95% CI, -0.074 to -0.027) and 0.084 percentage points per quarter for pneumonia (95% CI, -0.111 to -0.056). Models adjusting for clinical covariates attenuated or eliminated these changes for HF (-0.017 percentage points per quarter; 95% CI, -0.039 to 0.006) and for pneumonia (-0.026 percentage points per quarter; 95% CI, -0.052 to 0.001). Compared with the claims-based models, the clinical models for HF and pneumonia more accurately differentiated between patients who died after 30 days and those who did not. Conclusions and Relevance: Among HF and pneumonia hospitalizations, adjusting for clinical covariates attenuated declines in mortality rates identified using claims-based models. Assessments of temporal trends in 30-day mortality using claims-based risk adjustment should be interpreted with caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure and pneumonia (n=278,249). Clinical risk-adjustment models vs. Claims-based risk-adjustment models was evaluated on 30-day, all-cause mortality (HF: -0.017 percentage points/quarter; Pneumonia: -0.026 percentage points/quarter, 95% CI HF: -0.039 to 0.006; Pneumonia: -0.052 to 0.001). Adjusting for clinical covariates attenuated or eliminated the apparent declines in 30-day mortality for heart failure and pneumonia identified using claims-based risk-adjustment models.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: