Key result
Post-discharge 30-day mortality increased annually by 0.05% for heart failure, driven by patients receiving no post-discharge acute care, but decreased for AMI and remained unchanged for pneumonia.
Why the study?
Incentives to reduce readmissions raised concerns that patients needing hospitalization after discharge might be denied access, potentially increasing their mortality risk.
Does post-discharge acute care utilization affect 30-day mortality in Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HF, AMI, or pneumonia?
Cohort (n=8,474,199)
Yes
Does post-discharge acute care utilization affect 30-day mortality in Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HF, AMI, or pneumonia?
Effect estimate: annual increase of 0.05% for HF (95% CI 0.02% to 0.08%)
The increase in post-discharge mortality for heart failure patients during the HRRP era was concentrated among those who received no post-discharge acute care, many of whom were discharged to hospice, suggesting the policy did not increase mortality by denying acute care access.
Background With incentives to reduce readmission rates, there are concerns that patients who need hospitalization after a recent hospital discharge may be denied access, which would increase their risk of mortality. Objective We determined whether patients with hospitalizations for conditions covered by national readmission programs who received care in emergency department (ED) or observation units but were not hospitalized within 30 days had an increased risk of death. We also evaluated temporal trends in post-discharge acute care utilization in inpatient units, emergency department (ED) and observation units for these patients. Design, Setting, and Participants In this observational study, national Medicare claims data for 2008-2016, we identified patients ≥65 years hospitalized with heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or pneumonia, conditions included in the HRRP. Main Outcomes and Measures Post-discharge 30-day mortality according to patients’ 30-day acute care utilization. Acute care utilization in inpatient and observation units, and the ED during the 30-day and 31-90-day post-discharge period. Results There were 3,772,924 hospitalizations for HF, 1,570,113 for AMI, and 3,131,162 for pneumonia. The overall post-discharge 30-day mortality was 8.7% for HF, 7.3% for AMI, and 8.4% for pneumonia. Post-discharge mortality increased annually by 0.16% (95% CI, 0.11%, 0.22%) for HF, decreased by 0.15% (95% CI, -0.18%, -0.12%) for AMI, and did not significantly change for pneumonia. Specifically, mortality only increased for HF patients who did not utilize any post-discharge acute care, increasing at a rate of 0.16% per year (95% CI, 0.11%, 0.22%), accounting for 99% of the increase in post-discharge mortality in heart failure. Concurrent with a reduction in 30-day readmission rates, 30-day observation stays and visits to the ED increased across all 3 conditions during and beyond the post-discharge 30-day period. There was no significant change in overall 30-day post-acute care utilization (P-trend >0.05 for all). Conclusions and Relevance The only condition with an increasing mortality through the study period was HF; the increase preceded the policy and was not present among those received ED or observation unit care without hospitalization. Overall, during this period, there was not a significant change in the overall 30-day post-discharge acute care utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khera et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia (n=8,474,199). Post-discharge acute care utilization (ED or observation units) vs. No post-discharge acute care was evaluated on Post-discharge 30-day mortality (annual increase of 0.05% for HF, 95% CI 0.02% to 0.08%). Post-discharge 30-day mortality increased annually by 0.05% for heart failure, driven by patients receiving no post-discharge acute care, but decreased for AMI and remained unchanged for pneumonia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: