Why the study?
Do RAS inhibitors improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in diabetic patients with nephropathy?
Do RAS inhibitors improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in diabetic patients with nephropathy?
This review highlights evidence questioning the universal benefit of RAS inhibitors in diabetic patients with nephropathy, emphasizing the need for personalized therapy due to potential lack of efficacy and risk of hyperkalemia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Questions routine RAS-inhibitor use across all diabetics with nephropathy; leaves open subgroup-specific efficacy and hyperkalemia risks.
Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are currently advocated as the first line approach for diabetic patients with high blood pressure, particularly if early signs of renal damage are manifest. This mostly relies on the supposed benefits of these drugs, either achieved indirectly by blood pressure lowering or directly by pleiotropic effects, on cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Yet, data from large randomized controlled trials and independent meta-analyses seem to raise some concerns on the compelling use of RAS-inhibitors in the whole diabetic population as improvements in cardiovascular and renal endpoints may not be as definite as generally believed. Furthermore, the risk of adverse events, such as hyperkalemia, deserves more attention in diabetic patients.In this brief review we aimed at summarizing the most relevant available evidence on "negative" or "null" effects of RAS-inhibitors on clinical outcomes in diabetic patients, providing reasons for a "personalized" rather than generalized use of these drugs according to individual characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolignano et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: