Key result
Smart device app linked to ~38 percentage point higher scheduled transmission success vs. bedside consoles.
Why the study?
High adherence to remote monitoring in pacemaker patients improves outcomes, but adherence remains suboptimal.
Does a smart device app for remote monitoring improve the success rate of scheduled transmissions compared to traditional bedside consoles in pacemaker patients?
Cohort (n=245)
Yes
Does a smart device app for remote monitoring improve the success rate of scheduled transmissions compared to traditional bedside consoles in pacemaker patients?
A smart device app for pacemaker remote monitoring offers superior transmission success rates and high patient satisfaction compared to standard bedside consoles.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve scheduled RM transmission success in pacemaker patients; supports further RCTs before changing practice.
BackgroundHigh adherence to remote monitoring (RM) in pacemaker (PM) patients improves outcomes; however, adherence remains suboptimal. Bluetooth low-energy (BLE) technology in newer-generation PMs enables communication directly with patient-owned smart devices using an app without a bedside console.ObjectiveTo evaluate the success rate of scheduled RM transmissions using the app compared to other RM methods.MethodsThe BlueSync Field Evaluation was a prospective, international cohort evaluation, measuring the success rate of scheduled RM transmissions using a BLE PM or cardiac resynchronization therapy PM coupled with the MyCareLink Heart app. App transmission success was compared to 3 historical “control” groups from the Medtronic de-identified CareLink database: (1) PM patients with manual communication using a wand with a bedside console (PM manual transmission), (2) PM patients with wireless automatic communication with the bedside console (PM wireless); (3) defibrillator patients with similar automatic communication (defibrillator wireless).ResultsAmong 245 patients enrolled (age 64.8±15.6 years, 58.4% men), 953 transmissions were scheduled through 12 months, of which 902 (94.6%) were successfully completed. In comparison, transmission success rates were 56.3% for PM manual transmission patients, 77.0% for PM wireless patients, and 87.1% for defibrillator wireless patients. Transmission success with the app was superior across matched cohorts based on age, sex, and device type (single vs dual vs triple chamber).ConclusionThe success rate of scheduled RM transmissions was higher among patients using the smart device app compared to patients using traditional RM using bedside consoles. This novel technology may improve patient engagement and adherence to RM. High adherence to remote monitoring (RM) in pacemaker (PM) patients improves outcomes; however, adherence remains suboptimal. Bluetooth low-energy (BLE) technology in newer-generation PMs enables communication directly with patient-owned smart devices using an app without a bedside console. To evaluate the success rate of scheduled RM transmissions using the app compared to other RM methods. The BlueSync Field Evaluation was a prospective, international cohort evaluation, measuring the success rate of scheduled RM transmissions using a BLE PM or cardiac resynchronization therapy PM coupled with the MyCareLink Heart app. App transmission success was compared to 3 historical “control” groups from the Medtronic de-identified CareLink database: (1) PM patients with manual communication using a wand with a bedside console (PM manual transmission), (2) PM patients with wireless automatic communication with the bedside console (PM wireless); (3) defibrillator patients with similar automatic communication (defibrillator wireless). Among 245 patients enrolled (age 64.8±15.6 years, 58.4% men), 953 transmissions were scheduled through 12 months, of which 902 (94.6%) were successfully completed. In comparison, transmission success rates were 56.3% for PM manual transmission patients, 77.0% for PM wireless patients, and 87.1% for defibrillator wireless patients. Transmission success with the app was superior across matched cohorts based on age, sex, and device type (single vs dual vs triple chamber). The success rate of scheduled RM transmissions was higher among patients using the smart device app compared to patients using traditional RM using bedside consoles. This novel technology may improve patient engagement and adherence to RM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarakji et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Patients with pacemakers or cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P) (n=245). MyCareLink Heart app for remote monitoring vs. Traditional remote monitoring using bedside consoles (manual or wireless automatic transmission) was evaluated on Success rate of scheduled remote monitoring transmissions (Difference of 38.3 percentage points, 95% CI 34.8-41.9, p=<0.001). The MyCareLink Heart smart device app achieved a 94.6% scheduled transmission success rate, which was superior to the 56.3% success rate of traditional manual transmission using bedside consoles.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: