Key result
Home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators detected medical or technical events in 41.2% of patients, with a 0.50 probability of any event after 1.5 years (95% CI 0.42-0.58).
Why the study?
Does home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators provide early detection of medical and technical events in patients with ICDs?
Observational (n=260)
Does home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators provide early detection of medical and technical events in patients with ICDs?
Home monitoring of ICDs is feasible and allows for early detection of medical and technical events, with over 40% of patients experiencing an event during follow-up.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports remote ICD monitoring for event detection; leaves open effects on outcomes or practice change.
AIMS: With the expanding indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and reports of unexpected ICD failures, home monitoring (HM) was proposed to decrease follow-up workload and increase patient safety. Home monitoring implantable cardioverter defibrillators offer wireless, everyday transfer of ICD status and therapy data to a central HM Service Center, which notifies the attending physician of relevant HM events. We evaluated functionality and safety of HM ICDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 260 patients with HM ICDs were monitored for a mean of 10 +/- 5 months. Time to HM events [medical (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation) and technical (ICD system integrity)] since ICD implantation and since the latest in-clinic follow-up was analysed. Mean number of HM events per 100 patients per day was calculated, without and with a 2-day blanking period for re-notifying the same type of event. About 41.2% of the patients had HM events (38.1% medical, 0.8% technical, and 2.3% both types). Probability of any HM event after 1.5 years was 0.50 (95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.58). More than 60% of new HM event types occurred within the first month after follow-up. A mean of 0.86 event notifications was received per 100 patients per day or 0.45 with the 2-day blanking period. CONCLUSION: Home monitoring is feasible and associated with an early detection of medical and technical events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) indication (n=260). Home monitoring (HM) of implantable cardioverter defibrillators was evaluated on Probability of any HM event after 1.5 years (Probability 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.58). Home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators detected medical or technical events in 41.2% of patients, with a 0.50 probability of any event after 1.5 years (95% CI 0.42-0.58).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: