Why the study?
Does automatic remote home monitoring improve the detection of ICD lead and generator problems compared to conventional in-person follow-up in patients with ICDs?
Does automatic remote home monitoring improve the detection of ICD lead and generator problems compared to conventional in-person follow-up in patients with ICDs?
Automatic remote home monitoring of ICDs enhances the early detection of lead and generator malfunctions compared to conventional in-person follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Favors automatic remote monitoring for earlier ICD malfunction detection; extends randomized evidence supporting routine use over conventional follow-up.
Varma et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: