Key result
Transcatheter ablation is an effective treatment for macroreentrant and focal arrhythmias in patients with surgically corrected congenital heart disease, aided by advanced mapping technologies.
Why the study?
Does transcatheter ablation improve outcomes in patients with arrhythmias associated with congenital heart disease?
Does transcatheter ablation improve outcomes in patients with arrhythmias associated with congenital heart disease?
This review provides an overview of diagnostic challenges, mapping, ablation techniques, and outcomes for transcatheter ablation in patients with congenital heart disease.
May guide ablation in corrected congenital heart disease; leaves open need for randomized outcome data.
The improvement of surgical techniques resulted in significant life prolongation of many young patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). However, as these patients reach adulthood, their risk for late complications associated with surgery is also increased. One of the most difficult challenges associated with CHD is the high incidence of cardiac arrhythmias that arise from either the myocardial substrate created by abnormal physiology (pressure/volume changes, septal patches, and suture lines) or the presence of surgical scar. Catheter ablation is proven to be effective in treating atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in structurally normal hearts, and has also been used to treat arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease. In this review we provide an overview about diagnostic challenges, mapping and ablation techniques and outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter ablation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szili‐Törok et al. (2008) conducted a review in Arrhythmias associated with congenital heart disease. Transcatheter ablation was evaluated. Transcatheter ablation is an effective treatment for macroreentrant and focal arrhythmias in patients with surgically corrected congenital heart disease, aided by advanced mapping technologies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: