Key result
Constant high-intensity exercise resulted in lower cardiac output and muscle O2 saturation compared to incremental exercise at exhaustion, despite similar VO2.
Why the study?
Does a constant high-intensity exercise test result in different physiological components of VO2 max (cardiac output vs O2 extraction) compared to an incremental exercise test in healthy young men?
Does a constant high-intensity exercise test result in different physiological components of VO2 max (cardiac output vs O2 extraction) compared to an incremental exercise test in healthy young men?
Despite reaching similar VO2 max values at exhaustion, incremental exercise relies more on cardiac output while constant high-intensity exercise relies more on muscle oxygen extraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Test modality may alter cardiac output vs extraction balance at VO2max; leaves open protocol standardization for physiological assessment.
[Purpose] VO2 is expressed as the product of cardiac output and O2 extraction by the Fick equation. During the incremental exercise test and constant high-intensity exercise test, VO2 results in the attainment of maximal O2 uptake at exhaustion. However, the differences in the physiological components, cardiac output and muscle O2 extraction, have not been fully elucidated. We tested the hypothesis that constant exercise would result in higher O2 extraction than incremental exercise at exhaustion. [Subjects] Twenty-five subjects performed incremental exercise and constant exercise at 80% of their peak work rate. [Methods] Ventilatory, cardiovascular, and muscle oxygenation responses were measured using a gas analyzer, Finapres, and near-infrared spectroscopy, respectively. [Results] VO2 was not significantly different between the incremental exercise and constant exercise. However, cardiac output and muscle O2 saturation were significantly lower for the constant exercise than the incremental exercise at the end of exercise. [Conclusion] These findings indicate that if both tests produce a similar VO2 value, the VO2 in incremental exercise would have a higher ratio of cardiac output than constant exercise, and VO2 in constant exercise would have a higher ratio of O2 extraction than incremental exercise at the end of exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamamoto et al. (2014) studied Healthy (n=25). Constant high-intensity exercise test (CET) vs. Incremental exercise test (IET) was evaluated on Cardiac output at the end of exercise (p=<0.05). Constant high-intensity exercise resulted in lower cardiac output and muscle O2 saturation compared to incremental exercise at exhaustion, despite similar VO2.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: