Key result
Mobile phone acoustic recordings detect reduced LVEF with an AUROC of ~0.96.
Why the study?
No current technology allows for accurate measurement of relevant heart failure parameters in ambulatory, rural, or underserved settings, limiting telehealth use to diagnose or monitor heart failure.
Does mobile phone auscultation accurately estimate ejection fraction and stroke volume compared to echocardiography in ambulatory patients?
Case-Control (n=113)
Yes
Does mobile phone auscultation accurately estimate ejection fraction and stroke volume compared to echocardiography in ambulatory patients?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.955
Mobile phone auscultation using physics-based algorithms can accurately estimate ejection fraction and stroke volume, offering a potential telehealth diagnostic tool for heart failure.
BACKGROUND Heart failure (HF) contributes greatly to morbidity, mortality, and health care costs worldwide. Hospital readmission rates are tracked closely and determine federal reimbursement dollars. No current modality or technology allows for accurate measurement of relevant HF parameters in ambulatory, rural, or underserved settings. This limits the use of telehealth to diagnose or monitor HF in ambulatory patients. OBJECTIVE This study describes a novel HF diagnostic technology using audio recordings from a standard mobile phone. METHODS This prospective study of acoustic microphone recordings enrolled convenience samples of patients from 2 different clinical sites in 2 separate areas of the United States. Recordings were obtained at the aortic (second intercostal) site with the patient sitting upright. The team used recordings to create predictive algorithms using physics-based (not neural networks) models. The analysis matched mobile phone acoustic data to ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) as evaluated by echocardiograms. Using the physics-based approach to determine features eliminates the need for neural networks and overfitting strategies entirely, potentially offering advantages in data efficiency, model stability, regulatory visibility, and physical insightfulness. RESULTS Recordings were obtained from 113 participants. No recordings were excluded due to background noise or for any other reason. Participants had diverse racial backgrounds and body surface areas. Reliable echocardiogram data were available for EF from 113 patients and for SV from 65 patients. The mean age of the EF cohort was 66.3 (SD 13.3) years, with female patients comprising 38.3% (43/113) of the group. Using an EF cutoff of ≤40% versus >40%, the model (using 4 features) had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.955, sensitivity of 0.952, specificity of 0.958, and accuracy of 0.956. The mean age of the SV cohort was 65.5 (SD 12.7) years, with female patients comprising 34% (38/65) of the group. Using a clinically relevant SV cutoff of <50 mL versus >50 mL, the model (using 3 features) had an AUROC of 0.922, sensitivity of 1.000, specificity of 0.844, and accuracy of 0.923. Acoustics frequencies associated with SV were observed to be higher than those associated with EF and, therefore, were less likely to pass through the tissue without distortion. CONCLUSIONS This work describes the use of mobile phone auscultation recordings obtained with unaltered cellular microphones. The analysis reproduced the estimates of EF and SV with impressive accuracy. This technology will be further developed into a mobile app that could bring screening and monitoring of HF to several clinical settings, such as home or telehealth, rural, remote, and underserved areas across the globe. This would bring high-quality diagnostic methods to patients with HF using equipment they already own and in situations where no other diagnostic and monitoring options exist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huecker et al. (2024) conducted a case-control in Heart failure (n=113). Mobile phone acoustic recordings with physics-based predictive algorithms vs. Echocardiograms was evaluated on Detection of ejection fraction ≤40% (AUROC 0.955). A physics-based algorithm using mobile phone acoustic recordings accurately detected an ejection fraction ≤40% with an AUROC of 0.955, sensitivity of 0.952, and specificity of 0.958.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: