Key result
Web-based cardio-app demonstrates favorable usability in cardiac rehab, scoring ~74 on the SUS.
Why the study?
Mobile health apps can strengthen health literacy and disease management, prompting the development of a web-based cardio-app for patients with cardiovascular diseases.
Does a web-based cardio-app demonstrate good usability and patient acceptance for self-management following cardiac rehabilitation?
Cross-Sectional (n=158)
Yes
Does a web-based cardio-app demonstrate good usability and patient acceptance for self-management following cardiac rehabilitation?
A dedicated web-based application for cardiovascular disease self-management showed high usability and acceptance among post-rehabilitation patients.
App supports usability testing in post-rehab patients; leaves open whether it improves self-management outcomes in trials.
Background: The use of health-related mobile apps has become an important component of healthcare. Patients can use a range of tools to strengthen their health literacy and promote disease management. The aim of the project was to develop a web-based application for use on smartphones, tablets and computers for patients with cardiovascular diseases (cardio-app). Methods: = 158). The usability of the cardio-app was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The usage behaviour was conducted with a self-developed questionnaire. Results: The study enrolled 158 eligible rehabilitation patients. The SUS of the cardio-app determined was 74.4 (SD ± 17.4). For 86%, the menu navigation was self-explanatory and logical. The visual presentation appealed to 92% of respondents. The content of the texts used in the app was understandable for 95%, and 93% found the technical terms used in the glossary well explained. For 57%, the app was helpful in planning their physical activities. 83% of the rehabilitation patients would recommend the app to others. The main criticisms of the app were the lack of synchronization options with other apps. Of those who did not use the app, the following reasons for non-use were most frequently cited: too much effort (43%), lack of time (29%) and pandemic-related reasons (29%). Conclusions: The cardio-app revealed high agreement values. Whether the use of the app is associated with improved clinical state and outcome would have to be verified in further studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stamm-Balderjahn et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease, heart failure, or arterial hypertension in rehabilitation) (n=158). Web-based cardio-app was evaluated on Usability assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS). The web-based cardio-app demonstrated good usability with a mean System Usability Scale score of 74.4, and 83% of the rehabilitation patients would recommend the app to others.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: