PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026Discover Education0 citationsOpen Access

Addressing the digital divide in remote learning through a systematic review of global approaches and evidence from the pre-pandemic to post-pandemic era

FSFrancis SimuiSNSindile A. Ngubane

Key Points

  • The review aims to analyze global strategies for addressing digital inequalities in remote learning.
  • Systematic review of 45 studies from 2015 to 2025 examining digital inclusion.
  • Utilization of established frameworks and models, including van Dijk’s access model.
  • Identification of contributors to inequality and effectiveness of various strategies.
  • Technological access initiatives showed varied outcomes in improving remote learning access.
  • Digital literacy programs were effective but unevenly implemented globally.
  • Socio-economic support mechanisms demonstrated potential in enhancing meaningful digital participation.

Abstract

This systematic review examines 45 studies on global approaches to digital inclusion in remote learning between 2015 and 2025, positioning the COVID-19 pandemic not as the origin of the digital divide but as a catalyst that exposed and intensified longstanding inequalities in access, skills, and meaningful digital participation. Drawing on foundational digital divide scholarship—including Hargittai’s work on digital skills, Helsper’s digital inequalities framework, Correa’s digital capital, and van Deursen’s multidimensional competencies—this paper synthesizes interventions designed to mitigate disparities in remote learning. Guided by van Dijk’s four-stage access model and Sen’s Capability Approach, the review identifies contributors to inequality (RQ1), categories of strategies implemented globally (RQ2), and how their effectiveness has been reported in the literature (RQ3). Findings show that technological access initiatives, digital literacy programmes, socio-economic support mechanisms, and policy-level interventions have yielded uneven but instructive outcomes. The review contributes a theoretically grounded and comprehensive mapping of strategies for digital inclusion and offers evidence-based recommendations for more equitable remote learning systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Simui et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a226757763171746d546162https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01722-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper