Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates enhanced seismic performance and energy dissipation in steel shear walls with reverse slit configurations.
Conventional steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) are prone to bidirectional buckling and yielding under cyclic loading—i.e., cyclic buckling and yielding in two inclined tension-field directions—leading to fatigue cracking in the infill plate and reduced ductility and energy dissipation. To address this issue, a novel reverse-slit twin plate steel shear wall (RS-TP-SPSW) is proposed, in which two steel infill plates with reverse slit configurations replace the single infill plate of a conventional SPSW. This arrangement enforces unidirectional yielding in each plate, effectively mitigating fatigue cracking and enhancing seismic performance. Three reduced-scale test specimens—two RS-TP-SPSWs with different slit patterns and one conventional SPSW—were tested under cyclic loading. Key seismic behaviors, including damage progression, failure modes, hysteretic response, and energy dissipation, are reported. The RS-TP-SPSWs exhibited stable hysteretic behavior even at large deformations, achieving peak-load roof drift ratio up to 8.91% (maximum interstory drift ratio 8.89%) and ultimate roof drift ratio up to 10.01% (10.49%), far exceeding those of the conventional SPSW. Despite only a 5.2% increase in steel usage, the RS-TP-SPSWs achieved up to 63.7% higher cumulative energy dissipation, indicating a pronounced enhancement in seismic performance relative to the increase in material demand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: