PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026British journal of surgery0 citations

From VATS to RATS: Extending Minimally Invasive Approaches to Advanced and Complex Lung Cancer Resections

View Full Paper
EZE ZanfriniTKT KruegerEAE Abdelnour

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in complex lung cancer resections compared to traditional methods.
  • Analyzed consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary resections for lung cancer across two periods: pre-RATS and RATS era.
  • Surgeons experienced in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery transitioned to RATS and performed a comparative analysis.
  • Cohort groups matched for age, sex, and oncological stage.
  • The proportion of open resections decreased from 21.9% to 12.7% (p<0.001).
  • Conversion rates dropped from 3.9% to 3.0% (p=0.025).
  • Minimally invasive surgery feasibility improved for induction therapy cases (31.7% to 63.3%, p=0.005) and sleeve lobectomies (18% to 43%, p=0.011).

Abstract

Abstract Background Minimally invasive techniques have become central to the surgical management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is well established, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has emerged as a complementary platform with potential advantages in complex anatomical resections. Aims This study aims to report the impact of implementing a comprehensive RATS program in a high-volume single-center setting, focusing on the changes in surgical approach, perioperative outcomes, and the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for complex cases. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing anatomical pulmonary resections for primary lung cancer or pulmonary metastases were analyzed across two periods: a pre-RATS era (two years prior to RATS introduction) and a RATS era (two years after implementation). Surgeons were experienced in VATS before transitioning to RATS. Cohorts were propensity-matched for age, sex, and oncological stage. Primary endpoints included surgical approach, perioperative outcomes, and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases (post-induction therapy, sleeve resections). Results A total of 873 patients were included (pre-RATS: n=448; RATS era: n=425). Case mix and procedural distribution were comparable between groups. Following RATS implementation, the proportion of open resections significantly decreased (21.9% vs 12.7%, p0.001), as did conversion rates (3.9% vs 3.0%, p=0.025). Minimally invasive surgery was increasingly feasible after induction therapy (31.7% vs 63.3%, p=0.005) and for sleeve lobectomies (18% vs 43%, p=0.011). Operative time and postoperative outcomes, including length of stay, drainage duration, and complication rates, were similar between groups. Conclusion Implementation of a RATS program in a high-volume center is safe and effective and is associated with reduced thoracotomy rates. Importantly, RATS facilitates the extension of minimally invasive approaches to more complex and locally advanced lung cancer resections, supporting its role in the modern multimodal treatment era.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zanfrini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a226916763171746d5479d6https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag055.054
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transitioning from video-assisted to robotic-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection: outcomes from 340 cases in an Australian centre2025
  2. 2SRS344 - Robot-assisted thoracic surgery <i>versus</i> video-assisted thoracic surgery for resection of the lung: a systematic review and meta-analysis2026
  3. 3Robot‐Assisted Thoracic Surgery Versus Video‐Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis2026
  4. 4Comparative Clinical and Economic Analysis of Robotic versus Video-assisted thoracoscopic Anatomical Resection for Lung Cancer2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Multicenter study comparing outcomes of robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of non-small cell lung cancer following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy2026 · 1 citations