Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses fatigue in UIC screw couplings, indicating a need for redesign due to risk of failure.
Railway screw couplings are safety-critical, yet service failures show fatigue cracking at geometric discontinuities. This work assesses the response of two UIC screw-coupling components—the shackle and trunnion—under longitudinal forces from Traction–Emergency Braking (TEB) manoeuvres. A linear-elastic 3D finite element model was built for 42CrMo4/AISI 4140 steel, idealising the threaded load transfer with an RBE2 condensation and the hook–shackle interface with a tied contact to provide a repeatable baseline. Longitudinal force histories were generated in TrainDy for a freight consist and mapped to Regions of Interest; fatigue was evaluated in Altair HyperLife using rainflow counting, Goodman mean-stress correction, and Palmgren–Miner accumulation on a uniaxial S-N curve. For the 636 kN envelope case, the model predicts an axial displacement of 0.985 mm and von Mises stresses in several relevant regions near the nominal yield strength. Fatigue results rank the trunnion pin fillet as the governing hotspot: representative TEB sequences yield damage indices greater than 1 (often of order 20), while a lower-amplitude braking block shows negligible damage. Overall, the analysed spectra leave little endurance margin for the current geometry and support redesign of critical radii and more realistic contact/boundary modelling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Risaliti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: