Why the study?
Does measurement of BNP and NT-proBNP provide prognostic information for mortality and future heart failure in patients with unstable coronary artery disease?
Does measurement of BNP and NT-proBNP provide prognostic information for mortality and future heart failure in patients with unstable coronary artery disease?
BNP and NT-proBNP are strong, independent prognostic markers for mortality and heart failure in patients with unstable CAD, though their routine clinical utility requires further evaluation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enhance risk stratification in unstable CAD; leaves open effects on therapy selection and outcomes.
Patients with unstable coronary artery disease (CAD), i.e., unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, vary widely in clinical presentation, prognosis and response to treatment. To select appropriate therapy, early risk stratification has become increasingly important. This review focuses on the emerging role of natriuretic peptides in the early assessment of patients with unstable CAD. We conclude that levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are strongly associated to mortality and the risk of future congestive heart failure, and carry important prognostic information independent from previously known risk factors in unstable CAD. There are some data indicating that these markers can also be helpful in the selection of appropriate therapy in these patients but further studies are needed. Before a routine use of BNP or NT-proBNP in unstable CAD can be recommended, the cost-effectiveness of adding these new markers to the currently routine markers and their impact on selection of treatment needs further evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jernberg et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: