Key result
Uncontrolled blood pressure affects ~51% of patients across hospital settings, linked closely to medication adherence.
Why the study?
Hypertension is the second leading cause of death in Ghana, but adherence and accessibility to antihypertensive medications across different healthcare facility levels remained to be evaluated.
Cross-Sectional (n=485)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 52.9% vs 50.4%
In Ghanaian outpatient settings, inadequate medication accessibility and adherence are significantly associated with poor blood pressure control.
Uncontrolled BP remains common in Ghanaian hospitals; supports adherence research but should not yet change practice.
Hypertension is the second leading cause of death in Ghana, partly accounting for two-thirds of all medical admissions and more than 50% of deaths. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate adherence and accessibility to antihypertensive medications at two different levels of healthcare facilities in Kumasi, Ghana, and determine factors associated with medicine accessibility and adherence. A cross-sectional study involving outpatient department (OPD) hypertensive patients, 143 at KNUST Hospital (UHS) and 342 at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), was conducted using a semistructured questionnaire. Correlations were drawn to evaluate the effect of accessibility and adherence on blood pressure control. A face-to-face interview was also conducted with relevant stakeholders involved in procurement of medicines. Blood pressure was uncontrolled in 50.4% (n = 72) of participants at UHS and 52.9% (n = 181) at KATH. With respect to medicine accessibility, 98.8% (n = 338) and 42.9% (n = 61) received at least one medication from the hospital pharmacy of KATH and UHS, respectively. Using MARS-10, 49.2% (n = 70) and 52.9% (n = 181) were nonadherent in UHS and KATH, respectively. There was a significant association between adherence and BP control at both UHS ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0.038</a:mn> </a:math> ) and KATH ( <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>p</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>0.043</c:mn> </c:math> ). At UHS, there was a significant association between accessibility to medicines at the hospital and BP control ( <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mi>p</e:mi> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>0.031</e:mn> </e:math> ), whilst at KATH, no significant association was observed ( <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <g:mi>p</g:mi> <g:mo>=</g:mo> <g:mn>0.198</g:mn> </g:math> ). Supply chain practices and delays in payment by the NHIA affected accessibility to antihypertensive medications. Blood pressure control was inadequate among participants in both facilities. Accessibility to medicines was better at the tertiary facility compared to the secondary facility. Increased accessibility and adherence to antihypertensives were related to blood pressure control in both facilities. Good supply chain practices and prompt payment by the National Health Insurance Authority would enhance accessibility to antihypertensive medications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adomako et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=485). Tertiary hospital care (KATH) vs. Secondary hospital care (UHS) was evaluated on Uncontrolled blood pressure. Blood pressure was uncontrolled in 50.4% at the secondary hospital and 52.9% at the tertiary hospital, and medication adherence was significantly associated with blood pressure control at both.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: