Key result
Dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with optimal restoration of AV synchrony improved symptoms from NYHA class III to II and reduced pulmonary artery systolic pressure from 38 to 28 mmHg.
Why the study?
Does permanent pacemaker implantation improve symptoms and echocardiographic parameters in a patient with marked first-degree AV block and heart failure?
Population
1 72-year-old woman with marked first-degree AV block, moderate aortic stenosis, and NYHA class III symptoms…
Design
Case_report
Authors
Loading...
May benefit select HF patients with marked first-degree AV block; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does permanent pacemaker implantation improve symptoms and echocardiographic parameters in a patient with marked first-degree AV block and heart failure?
Dual-chamber pacing to restore AV synchrony may be a beneficial therapeutic option for patients with marked first-degree AV block and heart failure symptoms.
Andò et al. (2005) conducted a case report in First degree atrio-ventricular block and moderate aortic stenosis with heart failure (n=1). Dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantation vs. Baseline (pre-implantation) was evaluated on Echocardiographic parameters and heart failure symptoms. Dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with optimal restoration of AV synchrony improved symptoms from NYHA class III to II and reduced pulmonary artery systolic pressure from 38 to 28 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: