Key result
First-degree atrioventricular block in patients with stable coronary artery disease was associated with an increased risk of heart failure or cardiovascular death (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.02-2.54; P=0.04).
Why the study?
Is first-degree atrioventricular block associated with heart failure and mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=938)
Is first-degree atrioventricular block associated with heart failure and mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
In patients with stable coronary artery disease, first-degree AV block is not a benign finding and is independently associated with increased risks of heart failure hospitalization and death.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet alter management in stable CAD; leaves open whether first-degree AV block warrants closer surveillance or targeted trials.
AIMS: First-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) has traditionally been considered a benign electrocardiographic finding in healthy individuals. However, the clinical significance of first-degree AVB has not been evaluated in patients with stable coronary heart disease. We investigated whether first-degree AVB is associated with heart failure (HF) and mortality in a prospective cohort study of outpatients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured the P-R interval in 938 patients with stable CAD and classified them into those with (P-R interval ≥ 220 ms) and without (P-R interval <220 ms) first-degree AVB. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. During 5 years of follow-up, there were 123 hospitalizations for HF and 285 deaths. Compared with patients who had normal atrioventricular conduction, those with first-degree AVB were at increased risk for HF hospitalization (age-adjusted HR 2.33: 95% CI 1.49-3.65; P= 0.0002), mortality [age-adjusted HR 1.58; 95% CI (1.13-2.20); P = 0.008], cardiovascular (CV) mortality [age-adjusted HR 2.33; 95% CI (1.28-4.22); P= 0.005], and the combined endpoint of HF hospitalization or CV mortality (age-adjusted HR 2.43: 95% CI 1.64-3.61; P ≤ 0.0001). These associations persisted after multivariable adjustment for heart rate, medication use, ischaemic burden, and QRS duration. Adjustment for left ventricular systolic and diastolic function partially attenuated the effect, but first-degree AVB remained associated with the combined endpoint of HF or CV death (HR 1.61, CI 1.02-2.54; P= 0.04). CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients with stable coronary artery disease, first-degree AVB is associated with HF and death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crisel et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Stable coronary artery disease (n=938). First-degree atrioventricular block (P-R interval ≥ 220 ms) vs. Normal atrioventricular conduction (P-R interval <220 ms) was evaluated on Combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.02-2.54, p=0.04). First-degree atrioventricular block in patients with stable coronary artery disease was associated with an increased risk of heart failure or cardiovascular death (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.02-2.54; P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: