Key result
A 1-D CNN combining ECG and PCG achieves ~95% valve classification accuracy, outperforming single signals.
Why the study?
Heart valve defects are commonly analyzed using phonocardiograms, but synchronously recorded ECG and PCG signals can provide complementary information to improve classification.
Does a combined CNN-based analysis of synchronously recorded ECG and PCG signals improve heart valve defect classification accuracy compared to using either signal alone?
Does a combined CNN-based analysis of synchronously recorded ECG and PCG signals improve heart valve defect classification accuracy compared to using either signal alone?
A novel 1-D CNN architecture combining synchronously recorded ECG and PCG signals improves the accuracy of heart valve defect classification compared to single-signal approaches.
May enhance noninvasive valve defect detection; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Heart valve defects (HVDs) are commonly analyzed by using heart sound or phonocardiogram (PCG) signals. In many cases, additional information along with PCG analysis helps in obtaining effective decisions. Since time-synchronously recorded electrocardiogram (ECG) and PCG signals can help each other to handle HVD analysis, in this letter, an automatic classification approach is introduced by utilizing both of these signals in a proposed convolutional neural network (CNN)-based architecture. Motivated by the temporal characteristics of these signals, multilayer 1-D CNN is applied on each signal separately to extract 1-D temporal variation pattern. Prior to applying the signals to the proposed network, a preprocessing step followed by three-stage data augmentation is performed. In the multilayer CNN architecture, operation in each layer convolution is followed by batch normalization and dropout operations. Features extracted from the output of the CNN networks are combinedly utilized in the classifier stage. It is found that the use of combined features achieves an overall accuracy of 95.06%, which is around 5% and 2.6% higher than that obtained by using only ECG and only PCG signal, respectively. Moreover, the performance of the proposed method outperforms some existing methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morshed et al. (2023) studied Heart valve defects. Combined ECG and PCG signals using a 1-D CNN-based architecture vs. Only ECG or only PCG signals was evaluated on Overall classification accuracy. A proposed 1-D CNN architecture utilizing combined ECG and PCG features achieved an overall accuracy of 95.06% for heart valve defect classification, outperforming single-signal models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: