Key result
Polar Ignite watch overestimates VO2max vs CPET, showing poor validity in cardiac and Fontan patients.
Why the study?
Cardiorespiratory fitness as represented by VO2max is key for cardiovascular health, and wrist-worn fitness technology allows easy monitoring, but its validity needed comparison against gold-standard CPET in pediatric patients.
Does the Polar Ignite fitness watch accurately estimate VO2max compared to standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing in pediatric patients with normal cardiac anatomy and Fontan palliation?
Observational (n=47)
No
Does the Polar Ignite fitness watch accurately estimate VO2max compared to standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing in pediatric patients with normal cardiac anatomy and Fontan palliation?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.20 (normal cardiac) and 0.08 (Fontan)
The Polar Ignite fitness watch significantly overestimates VO2max compared to standard CPET in both normal and Fontan pediatric patients and cannot replace formal testing.
Polar Ignite VO2max estimates should not guide care in pediatric cardiac patients; Level 4 data leaves open need for prospective device validation.
Cardiorespiratory fitness as represented by maximum oxygen uptake, VO2max, is considered the best indicator for overall cardiovascular health. Fitness technology such as wrist worn devices, now allows for an easy method to monitor an individual’s VO2max. This study sought to compare the estimated VO2max measurements from the Polar Ignite (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland) fitness watch (Polar Ignite) against the gold standard, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in normal cardiac anatomy and Fontan pediatric patients. This single-center, prospective study enrolled patients with normal cardiac anatomy and single ventricle patients with Fontan palliation (Fontan) between 13-21 years. The Polar Ignite was fastened on the patient’s right or left wrist while supine and estimated VO2max was generated based on a non-exercise test (Polar Fitness Test). A maximal voluntary CPET using the standard Bruce Treadmill Protocol was then completed. Measurements from the two tests were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman method. Forty-seven patients were enrolled, including n=36 (77%) normal cardiac patients and n=11 (23%) Fontan patients. The majority of participants were white (n=41, 87%) and female (n=36, 66%). Patients were 15.3±1.9 years old, weighed 65.7±16.6 kg, and were 168.0±10.4 cm tall on average. The mean estimated Polar Ignite VO2max and peak CPET VO2 was 43.9±6.1 ml/kg/min vs 37.7±8.2 ml/kg/min, respectively in the normal cardiac group, and 42.6±3.9 ml/kg/min vs 22.6±5.6 ml/kg/min, respectively in the Fontan group. We found poor validity (ICC=0.21) and a weak correlation (r=0.31, p=0.07) between VO2max measured by the Polar Ignite and CPET in the normal cardiac group and poor validity (ICC=0.08) and strong correlation (r=0.84, p=0.001) in the Fontan group. In Bland-Altman analyses, the mean bias between VO2max as measured by the Polar Ignite and CPET was 6.85 ml/kg/min among the normal cardiac group and 20.05 ml/kg/min among the Fontan group. The Polar Ignite overestimated VO2max compared to CPET in both the normal cardiac and Fontan groups and cannot replace formal testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernandez et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Normal cardiac anatomy and Fontan palliation (n=47). Polar Ignite fitness watch vs. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was evaluated on Validity of estimated VO2max compared to CPET VO2peak (ICC 0.20 (normal cardiac) and 0.08 (Fontan)). The Polar Ignite fitness watch overestimated VO2max compared to cardiopulmonary exercise testing, with a mean bias of 6.85 ml/kg/min in normal cardiac patients and 20.05 ml/kg/min in Fontan patients, demonstrating poor validity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: