Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine cardiac autonomic nervous system differences following continuous versus discontinuous exercise in males and females.
Does continuous versus discontinuous aerobic training improve cardiac autonomic remodeling in healthy subjects?
Does continuous versus discontinuous aerobic training improve cardiac autonomic remodeling in healthy subjects?
Both continuous and discontinuous aerobic training improve fitness in healthy individuals, but discontinuous training may be more effective at improving supine vagal activity.
Hypothesis-generating for vagal benefits with discontinuous training in healthy adults; prospective RCTs needed before practice change.
The aim of this study was to examine the cardiac autonomic nervous system differences following either continuous vs. discontinuous exercise in males and females. Forty-seven healthy male and female subjects (M=19, F=28; Age=36.95±13.79) underwent a baseline test for VO2peak and tilt table testing. They were assigned to a one-month control period before returning to repeat the testing and then begin one month of either continuous aerobic treadmill work for 30 min at 70% peak heart rate (N=23) or 3 bouts of 10 min at 70% of peak heart rate with two 10-min break periods in between (N=24). Following exercise, both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in VO2peak (p<0.001). Treatment differences were detected while tilted in continuous as a decreases in the percentage of instances within an hour that the normal sinus interval exceeds 50 ms (p=0.036) and in the high-frequency component (p=0.023). While supine, the discontinuous group saw reduction in heart rate (p=0.004), and an increase in high-frequency (p=0.018). These data suggest that for healthy people either continuous or discontinuous aerobic training is effective in improving measures of fitness; however discontinuous is better able to improve supine indices of vagal activity on heart rate variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Landram et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: