Key result
Manual measurements of carotid intima-media thickness showed variable intra- and interobserver agreements, with the averaged thickness (IMTmean) demonstrating better reproducibility than maximum thickness.
Why the study?
What is the intra- and interobserver agreement of manual measurements of carotid IMT and hemodynamic parameters using Doppler ultrasound in patients with cardiovascular risk factors?
Observational (n=21)
Blinded to previous and other operators' results
No
What is the intra- and interobserver agreement of manual measurements of carotid IMT and hemodynamic parameters using Doppler ultrasound in patients with cardiovascular risk factors?
Manual measurement of average carotid IMT (IMTmean) yields better reproducibility than maximum IMT (IMTmax) in clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Variable agreement advises caution with manual carotid IMT; leaves open optimal measurement protocols for research.
AIMS: To evaluate the carotid ultrasound intra- and interobserver agreements in a common clinical scenario when making manual measurements of the intima-media thickness (IMT) and peak systolic (PSV) and end diastolic (EDV) velocities in the common (CCA) and the internal carotid (ICA) arteries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different experienced operators performed two time-point carotid ultrasounds in 21 patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Each operator measured freehand the CCA IMT three consecutive times in each examination. The CCA and ICA hemodynamic parameters were acquired just once. For our purpose we took the average (IMTmean) and maximum (IMTmax) IMT values. Quantitative variables were analyzed with the t-student, and ANOVA test. Agreements were evaluated with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: IMTmean intraobserver agreement was better on the left (ICC: 0.930-0.851-0.916, operators 1-2-3) than on the right (ICC: 0.789-0.580-0.673, operators 1-2-3). IMTmax agreements (Left ICC: 0.821-0.723-0.853, operators 1-2-3; Right ICC: 0.669-0.421-0.480, operators 1-2-3) were lower and more variable. Interobserver agreements for IMTmean (ICC: 0.852-0.860; first-second ultrasound) and IMTmax (ICC: 0.859-0.835; first-second ultrasound) were excellent on the left, but fair-good and more variable on the right (IMTmean; ICC: 0.680-0.809; first-second ultrasound; IMTmax; 0.694-0.799; first-second ultrasound). Intraobserver agreements were fair-moderate for PSVs and good-excellent for EDVs. Interobserver agreements were good-excellent for both PSVs and EDVs. Overall, 95% confidence intervals were narrower for the left IMTmean and CCA velocities. CONCLUSIONS: Intra and interobserver agreements in carotid ultrasound are variable. In order to improve carotid IMT agreements, IMTmean is preferable over IMTmax.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular risk factors (n=21). Manual carotid ultrasound measurements was evaluated on Intraobserver agreement for left common carotid artery IMTmean (ICC 0.851-0.930). Manual measurements of carotid intima-media thickness showed variable intra- and interobserver agreements, with the averaged thickness (IMTmean) demonstrating better reproducibility than maximum thickness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: