Handheld Versus Conventional Ultrasound for Assessing Carotid Artery in Routine Volunteers

Objective: The study aimed to estimate the feasibility and accuracy of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and hemodynamic parameters measurement in a handheld ultrasound device. Methods: Utilizing an ex vivo pig carotid artery sample, CIMT was measured with a handheld ultrasound and compared with histopathology. Then we performed a carotid ultrasound on 25 volunteers using a handheld ultrasound device and a conventional ultrasound system. After a week, these volunteers were scanned again by the same observer. Assessments of the max IMT, mean IMT and hemodynamic parameters (PSV, EDV, PI, RI, S/D, ACCEL, AT, TAMEAN) were compared. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess inter-device agreement. Repeatability and correlation of mean IMT were analyzed by Bland–Altman Plots and linear correlation analysis. Results: The mean IMT measured from the common carotid artery by handheld ultrasound showed good agreement (ICC=0.79) with conventional ultrasound. Furthermore, we obtained good repeatability and a consistent trend in the mean value of IMT before and after (r = 0.680, P < 0.01). In addition, the max IMT and the hemodynamic parameters (PSV, EDV, S/D, ACCEL, TAMEAN) showed moderate agreement (ICC=0.73, 0.52, 0.58, 0.70, 0.61, 0.51, respectively). The PI, RI and HR values were excellent agreement with conventional ultrasound (ICC=0.80, 0.84, 0.94). Conclusion: About the basic assessment of carotid, the images and parameters obtained using handheld ultrasound showed a moderate to excellent agreement with conventional ultrasound. The handheld ultrasonic devices can be widely used as a diagnostic tool for carotid artery structure and hemodynamics examination.