Key result
An intervention strategy including modified training load and individualized strength programs significantly reduced injury incidence (RR 0.14; p=0.05) in high-risk adolescent male footballers.
Why the study?
The adolescent growth spurt is associated with an increased risk of injury in young athletes, prompting an interdisciplinary strategy to mitigate this risk.
Does an interdisciplinary intervention strategy reduce injury incidence and burden in male academy footballers during the adolescent growth spurt?
Cohort (n=77)
Does an interdisciplinary intervention strategy reduce injury incidence and burden in male academy footballers during the adolescent growth spurt?
Relative Risk: 0.14
Absolute Event Rate: 0.8% vs 5.2%
p-value: p=0.05
An interdisciplinary intervention strategy significantly reduced injury incidence and burden in high-risk male academy footballers during their growth spurt.
May support targeted prevention in high-risk adolescent footballers; hypothesis-generating, needs RCTs before practice change.
Background:The adolescent growth spurt is associated with an increased risk of injury in young athletes.Aim: This study aimed to use an interdisciplinary collaboration between technical coaches, sports scientists, and medical staff to mitigate this risk.Subjects and methods: 77 male academy footballers were followed across two seasons.at-risk players were identified using somatic maturity status and growth rate in stature and the lower limbs, using thresholds of 88% to 92.8% of predicted adult stature, 7.2 cm/year, and 3.6 cm/year, respectively.During the 2019-20 season, players with symptoms of a growth-related injury or two of three risk factors were included in an intervention strategy that included modified training load, football-specific skills, balance, coordination and landing drills, and an individualised strength program.Results: For players with the three risk factors, there was a significant reduction in the incidence (rate ratio [rr] = 0.14 (5.2 per 1000h 0.8 per 1000h, p = 0.05) and burden (rr = 0.08 (216 per 1000h 17 per 1000h, p = 0.02) between the seasons.For players with 2 risk factors, there were no significant differences in injury risk between the baseline and intervention seasons.Conclusion: Overall, it may be possible to mitigate injury incidence and burden during the adolescent growth spurt in high-risk athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Injury risk during adolescent growth spurt (n=77). Intervention strategy (modified training load, skills, balance, coordination, landing drills, strength program) vs. Baseline season was evaluated on Injury incidence (per 1000h) (RR 0.14, p=0.05). An intervention strategy including modified training load and individualized strength programs significantly reduced injury incidence (RR 0.14; p=0.05) in high-risk adolescent male footballers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: