Key result
Higher Visceral Adiposity Index tracks coronary plaque presence with ~0.76 AUC on CCTA.
Why the study?
Persons with well-treated HIV have a 2-fold higher cardiovascular disease risk potentially related to excess visceral adipose tissue, prompting evaluation of the visceral adiposity index in association with cardiometabolic factors.
Does the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) predict the presence of subclinical coronary plaque better than traditional ASCVD risk scores in well-treated persons with HIV?
Cross-Sectional (n=45)
Yes
Does the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) predict the presence of subclinical coronary plaque better than traditional ASCVD risk scores in well-treated persons with HIV?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.760
p-value: p=0.008
The Visceral Adiposity Index serves as a practical, non-imaging clinical biomarker that outperforms traditional ASCVD risk scores for identifying subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in persons with HIV.
Background Persons with well-treated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) demonstrate a 2-fold higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which may be related to excess visceral adipose tissue (VAT). The visceral adiposity index (VAI) is a score to approximate VAT by combining biochemical measures with anthropometrics without quantification by imaging. We evaluated VAI in association with cardiometabolic factors among persons with HIV (PWH). Methods Forty-five PWH on antiretroviral therapy and virologically controlled with increased abdominal VAT (VAT area >110 cm2 on CT) and no known CVD were included. VAI was calculated using standard sex-specific formulas. Coronary plaque was assessed using coronary CT angiography. Results Participants were predominantly male (73%), white (53%), and non-Hispanic (84%), with a mean age of 55 (standard deviation, 7) years. Among PWH, median VAI was calculated to be 4.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.8–7.3). Log VAI correlated with log VAT (r = 0.59, P < .0001) and anthropometric measures (body mass index: r = 0.36, P = .02; waist circumference: r = 0.43, P = .004; waist-to-hip ratio: r = 0.33, P = .03). Participants with coronary plaque had a higher VAI compared to those without coronary plaque (median, 5.3 [IQR, 3.4–10.5] vs 2.8 [IQR, 1.8–5.0]; P = .004). VAI (area under the curve = 0.760, P = .008) performed better than the atherosclerotic CVD risk score to predict the presence of plaque in receiver operating characteristic analyses. Conclusions VAI may be a useful biomarker of metabolic dysfunction and increased CVD risk that may occur with VAT accumulation in PWH. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02740179.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with increased abdominal visceral adipose tissue (n=45). Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) vs. Absence of coronary plaque was evaluated on Prediction of the presence of any coronary plaque on CT angiography by VAI (AUC 0.760, p=0.008). The Visceral Adiposity Index predicted the presence of coronary plaque with an AUC of 0.760, and VAI levels were significantly higher in those with plaque (median 5.3) versus without (median 2.8).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: