Key result
Preoperative CT optimizes device selection and procedural planning in transcatheter structural heart interventions.
Why the study?
Careful preprocedural assessment is crucial for transcatheter structural heart procedures, and this review aims to describe the role of CT scanning in decision-making and expand clinicians' understanding of its benefits and drawbacks.
CT scanning is a paramount imaging technique for the preoperative planning and decision-making of transcatheter structural heart interventions.
Supports CT integration into structural heart planning workflows; leaves open need for standardized protocols and prospective outcome trials.
Computed tomography (CT) scanning has recently assumed a first-pillar role in the preoperative planning of patients undergoing transcatheter structural heart procedures (e.g., transcatheter aortic valve implantation, TAVI; MitraClip; Triclip; left atrial appendage occlusion, LAAO). A careful preprocedural assessment is crucial for achieving the best possible result, and, currently, CT represents the paramount technique to obtain morphological data on cardiac and vessel structures, thus allowing to choose the most appropriate vascular approach, the type and size of devices, and all the required steps to meet procedural expectations. The image reconstruction accuracy also provides information to predict potential complications such as misplacements and leakages. This review aims to describe the role of CT in the decision-making approach of patients undergoing structural heart interventions and expand the clinicians’ understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of this imaging technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Circhetta et al. (2023) conducted a review in Structural heart disease. Computed tomography (CT) scan was evaluated. Computed tomography scanning plays a paramount role in the preoperative planning of transcatheter structural heart procedures by providing critical morphological data to optimize device selection and approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: