Key result
Self-measurement of single nocturnal blood pressure at home showed poor reproducibility, with absolute test-retest differences >10 mmHg in 46.9% of subjects for systolic pressure.
Why the study?
Does self-measurement of nocturnal blood pressure at home provide reproducible readings in the general population?
Observational (n=556)
Does self-measurement of nocturnal blood pressure at home provide reproducible readings in the general population?
The reproducibility of single nocturnal BP assessed by home self-measurement is poor, particularly when sleep quality varies between sessions, highlighting the need to account for sleep quality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single nocturnal home BP readings warrant caution in practice; leaves open whether repeated measurements enhance reproducibility in research.
To assess the reproducibility of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) during sleep as measured using a self-measurement device at home, we obtained repeated nocturnal home BP at 0200 h and quality of sleep assessment from a diary in 556 subjects (71% women, 62.4±11.1 years) in the general population. We used an Omron device (HEM-747IC-N, Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), with which the time and frequency of monitoring can be preset and the readings stored. The mean±SD of the difference between test-retest BP measurements was 0.7±15.1 mmHg systolic and 0.2±9.7 mmHg diastolic with a mean interval of 5.9 days. The absolute differences were greater than 10 mmHg in 261 (46.9%) subjects for systolic and 145 (26.0%) subjects for diastolic. There was no evidence of regression to the mean in nocturnal measurements over at least three nights (n=390, p>0.22). The differences (the first minus the second measurement) were large in subjects who experienced sleep disturbance only in the first (n=64, 2.3±13.6 mmHg and 1.6±9.6 mmHg for systolic and diastolic, respectively) or second sessions (n=56, −4.1±16.4 mmHg and −2.5±11.4 mmHg) compared with the subjects without sleep disturbance (n=66, 1.5±17.8 mmHg and 0.8±10.3 mmHg) and those with sleep disturbance (n=370, 0.9±14.5 mmHg and 0.2±9.3 mmHg) in both sessions. In conclusion, the reproducibility of single nocturnal BP as assessed using a self-measurement device at home was not good, especially for subjects who experienced different quality of sleep in each session. To evaluate nocturnal BP using a self-measurement device, estimation of quality of sleep is indispensable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosohata et al. (2007) conducted an observational in General population (n=556). Self-measurement of nocturnal blood pressure at home was evaluated on Difference between test-retest blood pressure measurements (MD 0.7). Self-measurement of single nocturnal blood pressure at home showed poor reproducibility, with absolute test-retest differences >10 mmHg in 46.9% of subjects for systolic pressure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: